Archive for the ‘opinion/news’ Category

…because I think it is a mountain out of a molehill, but it gives me the chance to tell a great story from Tip O’Neil’s autobiography Man of the House (that even now R. C. Lane and other liberals are checking to determine who actually wrote it.) page 108. The Scene JFK’s Inauguration:

On the aisle was George Kara whom we used to call the ambassador because he came to Washington so often. George was an affluent businessman from Boston who was a kind of a mystery man. He knew everyone and everyone knew him, but nobody could say exactly what he did for a living.

George Kara used to show up everywhere. If the governor was being sworn in, George was on hand. If the Yankees were in town to play the Red Sox, George would be sitting with the players wives. If there was a championship fight, George had a ringside seat. There’s a guy like George in every town.

“Push over, Ambassador,” I said.

“Quiet, Tip, or they’ll kick us the hell out.” But he moved over to make room for me.

A moment later, Jack Kennedy was standing beside me, waiting to climb the steps to take the oath of office. “How are you, Tip?” he asked.

“Fine, Mr. President. Good luck and God be with you.”

Then George Kara leaned over and said, “Mr. President, good luck and may God be with you.”

Just then the band started playing “Hail to the Chief,” and Kennedy marched down the aisle and up to the rostrum to be sworn in as president. As the music played George leaned over to me and said, “Years from now, historians will wonder what was on the young man’s mind as he strode to take his oath of office. I bet he’s asking himself, how George Kara got such a good seat.”

…The scene now shifts to the Inaugural ball and Kennedy asks Tip a question…

“…Was that George Kara sitting beside you?”

“Yes,” I replied. “And when the band played and you stepped forward to be sworn in, George told me that future historians would wonder what was on your mind at that moment.”

“Tip,” he said, “you’ll never believe it. I had my left on the Bible and my right hand in the air, and I was about to take the oath of office, and I said to myself, How the hell did Kara get that seat?”

Flash forward 4 years (and one page) for LBJ’s inauguration Tip is sitting with Ted and Bobby Kennedy and has just repeated the story to them…

They both knew George and they got a tremendous laugh out of the story.

A couple of minutes later. Bobby tapped me on the arm and pointed to a man in a dark coat. “Tip,” he said, “is that were Kara was sitting?”

“Yes,” I said, “that’s just about the same location.” Then I blinked hard and took another look, and wouldn’t you know it–the man with the dark coat was George Kara! There he was sitting in the very same seat for Johnson’s inauguration as he had for Kennedy’s. To this day, I still don’t know how on earth he got there.

This book is full of stories like this and would make a great Christmas present for the political or historical junkie in the house. My Amazon review written almost a decade ago is here.

The only difference between the Salahis and George Kara is George is was a smart enough guy to stay low key. Then again he didn’t have facebook did he?

I actually think stuff like this happens all the time, usually on a much smaller stage, my father always said if you want to get in someplace just act like you belong there.

Two quick comments on Baldilocks post

Posted: December 11, 2009 by datechguy in opinion/news
Tags: , ,

concerning Blacks and the federal government.

It is worth noting that the Communist governments took advantage of the civil rights failings of the United States to critique the country. This was done in the context of the cold war, anyone with any knowledge of communism and its history knows that the words “Soviet Union” and “Civil Rights” don’t go together.

It is however important because the lip service they gave had international implications, because of this I understand Black academics reluctance to oppose these governments. They are paying back a supposed debt, personally I think that debt is long since paid but it’s up to them to figure it out.

Secondly and I know this is a bit of snark, but it is funny to note that this is Baldilocks 15th instalanche and her 2nd since the a certain green with envy blogger banned her and last saw one.

Life is funny that way.

Sarah Palin continues to prove herself a master of political Jiu-Jitsu.

Palin’s statement causes Gore to respond. Since Gore is responding the networks cover it and are forced to cover the climategate issue, even to discount it, but Palin also throws back:

Former Vice President Gore also claimed today that the scientific community has worked on this issue for 20 years, and therefore it is settled science. Well, the Climategate scandal involves the leading experts in this field, and if Climategate is proof of the larger method used over the past 20 years, then Vice President Gore seriously needs to consider that their findings are flawed, falsified, or inconclusive.

Vice President Gore, the Climategate scandal exists. You might even say that it’s sort of like gravity: you simply can’t deny it.

and the networks (like Morning Joe this morning) cover that too.

The end result of all of this will be people’s exposure to the evidence, this can’t but hurt the Climate change cult as thread after thread that defends the “decline hiders” turns into rebuttal from normally reliable readers.

Most importantly while the usual suspects cry foul, fair people on the other side are asking probing questions about the data.

The worm is turning and their fear is palatable. When Palin can go toe to toe with as seasoned a pol as a former congressman, Senator and 2 term Vice president from a political family and come out not only ahead but standing the left has to be shaking.

Exit Question: Is it a coincidence that one person in this debate is making public appearances all over the country, while the other ducks public forums?

…and so far the speech is first rate.

The acknowledgment of those who came before him, winning the prize due to decades of action and suffering, was and is very important. The call out to those who are actually doing peacemaking and are imprisoned for the cause of freedom (it would have been nice to say a few by name but I’ll take it).

He acknowledges the war and his involvement in deploying troops. He declares it a just war.

He then talks about the history of the 20th century and talks about the doctrine of Just war and makes it clear that the United States is justly proud of it’s actions.

He talks about “A few small men with outsized rage.” That is the best description of the terrorists we fight that I’ve heard. He says that you can not negotiate with Al Qaeda.

“To say that force is sometimes necessary is not cynicism”. Is this Actually Barack Obama talking?

He declares publicly that the peace of the latter half of the 20th century was directly purchased by American power and blood. This is a Nixon/China moment. They would have laughed at George Bush saying that even if it was true.

Whoever wrote this speech isn’t being paid enough, this is clearly the best speech I’ve ever heard him give.

Now he is going back to his normal stuff, he is about to hit Gitmo etc…

Ran outside to sand the walk before the wife leaves for work so missed it from that point where he says Wanting peace is not enough it make it happen.

The only applause he gets is when he hits Gitmo, the torture line is BS. this tells us more about this crowd then anything else.

I think he is going too long now, if he is smart he will cut is short here.

He is now talking about proliferation.

Those who care about their own security can’t ignore localized arms races.

He talks about the need to act rather than sit back concerning sanctions.

He talks about freedom of speech and religion and it’s necessity for peace.

He hits Burma and Zimbabwe and Iran by name holy shit he is sounding like an Actual president!

Update: The Wall Street Journal is liveblogging this speech.

He now gives Copenhagen a thumbs up and plugs climate change. Nonsense but not unexpected.

Hits the concept of “Holy War”, throws a bone to Islam by attacking the Crusades. He hasn’t read his Thomas Madden.

Clearly a first rate speech and a decent job. I think it was very much a Nixon China speech. On Morning Joe they point out that the European left will not like this speech.

Update 2: The NYT Take is here.

Talkleft describes the situation as a travesty of a Mockery, it’s true in my opinion he doesn’t deserve the prize but it’s a consolation that the socialist European left that gave him the prize had to listen to him tell them that their ideal world only exists thanks to American Power and Blood, that’s gotta leave a mark!

I guess this is sort of a non-traditional liveblog of President Obama Nobel Olympic Speech, I’d be interested if people think I should have done a more traditional one with timestamps and more direct quotes.

Update 3: Is it just me or could George Bush have given that speech with only minor alterations?

Update 4: I guess I’m in good company

Sarah Palin and President Obama don’t agree on much, but last year’s Republican vice presidential nominee just gave the president’s defense of “just wars” a thumbs up in an interview with USA TODAY. In fact, she said that the president’s address in Oslo, where he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize today, reminded her of what she wrote on the same subject in her hugely successful memoir, Going Rogue.

Smart woman that.