Posts Tagged ‘dishonorable left’

Today has been a pain of a day as my plans were dramatically changed due to vaccine mandates at a Massachusetts state college (surprise, surprise) but fortunately there have been a few things to laugh about to make things better.

First the folks at Media Matters the single biggest dispenser of falsehoods in the media world are calling for the firing of the fact checker for the Washington Post:

Now in fairness given the overall accuracy of the Washington Post fact checker this would not be an unreasonable request except for that he is upset because he actually accurately checked a fact.

In fact that’s a bit of an exaggeration.

When it was originally reported by the Free Beacon that the White House safe smoking kits included crack pipes he dismissed it as relying on “assumptions”. So when the Free Beacon went out and got some of those kits distributed in several cities and displayed said kits for the world to see

, which indeed had crack pipes included, rather than correcting his original article, he simply retweeted the free Beacon piece.

No correction no retraction, just retweeting the actual fact that proved him wrong.

But even that small act was a bridge too far for media matters. Communicating actual facts that show the left for what they are isn’t what Soros and company are paying for.

Do otherwise and you’re an un-person.

The second clown to laugh at is Joe Biden and his White House that put out this tweet yesterday:

the only problem of course is that the vaccine was available when Trump was still president. Here comes the Washington Post Fact checker again…

In fact you have multiple Biden and “office of the president elect” releases on the subject.

These fools need to be pointed to and laughed at but the real joke is on us for letting these people get away with stealing an election. So in one sense the clowns are us.

Closing thought: I predict that in five years when the true side effects of the vaccine can’t be so easily hidden the media will be rushing to call it the “Trump Vaccine”.

If you want to confirm that Democrats are the party of death this is the perfect illustration:

What a difference a dead baby makes

So let’s get this straight.

To the Democrat left drugs that might be used on Horses are excellent for people if they are used to kill a child and should be promoted and widely made available

But drugs that might be used on Horses are beyond the pale if used to save a person’s life and any medical professional who recommends it should lose their ability to practice medicine & banned from social media.

Like I said the party of death.

It is becoming increasingly hard to presume that the Democratic left is not at best the willing dupes of Satan or at worst his obedient servants.

It amazes me that anyone is surprised at the left leaking an SCOTUS opinion concerning overturning Roe Vs Wade.

People who are willing to use riots, violence in US cities and draconian COVID sanctions, not to mention stealing election are not going to blink at breaking norms.

What I’m really interested in knowing is if one of the justices authorized said leak or hinted to a clerk to do so.

It’s no surprise to me if it’s true, remember dishonorable people don’t suddenly become honorable because they are elevated to a position of honor or hired to assist someone in such a position.

Back when the left could count one enough votes to keep their agenda going the left/media were all about the sanctity of the court. We’ve been seeing signs for months if not years that the left media is all in on abandoning said position.

There is no surer sign that the left believes they will not retake the court’s majority anytime soon then a tactic like this which hurts the institution and it’s reputation. If the court is not theirs then as far as they are concerned it’s not legit.

As a general rule you will see Roberts vote with the right in three situations:

  1. If the right already has five votes without him so it doesn’t matter
  2. If the left already has five votes without him so it doesn’t matter
  3. If it’s an issue that the left is not invested in.

If however you have a key issue like Obamacare where he can give the left the winning vote he’ll always vote with the Obama crowd.

This time it’s different. If the left can’t intimidate one of the five actual conservatives Roberts vote would not matter in theory but if they can’t change the end result the next best thing the can do is make it a 5-4 vote in order to make it seem less legit so without a doubt Roberts vote will be required of him by the left.

That to me will be the key tell that the left has something on John “Old Yellowstain” Roberts to keep him in line. If you didn’t believe it before before you’d better start believing it now.

I’d be delighted to be proven wrong, but frankly if he becomes the 6th vote to overturn I think the shock might be too much for me.

Finally it will be quite interesting to see how far the left goes in terms of violent protect in DC. Given that there are still dozens of people still being held without trial for basically trespassing on January 6th how the Capital Police and the AG & White House treats people who go over the line here is going to be VERY telling.

I predict that anything short of actually murdering a conservative justice will not rise to the level of “insurrection” to the press, and even that might still cause any protests to be called “mostly peaceful”

Unexpectedly of course

I’m not going to bother with a long essay here I’m going to explain this provocative statement in just a few sentences.

For the last several years we have seen it clearly demonstrated that the left and it’s gatekeepers are dishonest and dishonorable who have lied, cheated, stolen elections, persecuted political enemies while allowing rioters to go free and enriched themselves and those who willing to aid them in these efforts to a point where I’m actually surprised that we haven’t ended up with a shooting war here.

These very people have now advanced Ketanji Brown Jackson as their primary choice to be on the final arbiter of justice in these United States and moreover they have done so over an alternative choice, favored by one of their own that not only met their dishonorable racial/gender quota1 but who, whose qualifications, honesty and integrity were vouched for by two members of the opposite party who are diametrically opposed to her judicial philosophy.

I submit and suggest that Judge J. Michelle Childs was not passed over because her honesty and integrity was doubted by these dishonest and dishonorable gatekeepers, but because it was believed and thus could not be counted to to advance the agenda of dishonest and dishonorable people.

And of course there is this, when you conceal documents it’s for a reason.

For these reasons I think anyone who does not start from the proposition that Judge Jackson is dishonest and dishonorable is a fool. If on the basis of objective facts and evidence you are persuaded otherwise that’s up to you, but any person who thinks bad actors advance good people to achieve evil ends are smoking something.

1Let the record show that neither Joe Biden nor anyone in his administration has been willing or able to define “Woman” or “Black”. I’d find it quite interesting to hear judge Jackson’s definition of either.