Posts Tagged ‘little miss attila’

But this closing paragraph in Little Miss Attila’s pretty good commentary on the Ground Zero Mosque carries over to many subjects:

Voters should also think twice about re-electing politicians who associate themselves with dick moves.

If I am making an exception to one of my personal rules, it’s likely because:

#1 I’ve very very tired right now.

#2 If you’re going to break a rule, it might as well be with Little Miss Attila, as I recall I broke that same rule during my CPAC interview with her.

#3 That is a great point that is worth remembering

People often forget that just because you make an exception to a rule doesn’t mean it is out the window.

Cue 1812 for Little Miss Attila

Posted: July 14, 2010 by datechguy in Uncategorized
Tags: ,

Who is the latest addition to my blogroll.

I like to add people once every few months rather than just throwing things on, it’s more fun that way.

The Hymes clan continues to give Little Miss Attila a whole lot of attention.

Even through another member of Baptist Tabernacle, that is initiating contact, which is in general the fastest way to get me to blog about the Hymerses. (The other two things that will get me to do it are when I get heart-wrenching stories from former cultists that I’m given permission to publish [with names redacted, natch], or when Dr. R.L. Hymers gets media coverage.)

She links to and comments on the response of the “church” but shows the difference between the pair.

When one side in a dispute is willing to link to both sides and let people make up their own mind while the other runs to the FBI, tell me who is more confident in their beliefs?

of the Hymers report from 1988 Money Quote:

[Other Newcaster]: “Phones have been ringing upstairs from people who have had a lot of contact with him. Good and bad, right?”

Anson: “Right, you know I expected a lot of angry phone calls from the story yesterday—angry phone calls from his current members. And there have been a couple of those, but the overwhelming response has been from other former members. Other members than you’ve seen in these two stories, and they confirm everything that the others talk about.”

Forgetting just for a moment the attack on my friend, it is of course natural for a son to defend his father. If one is going to do so perhaps one might consider using one’s head as the charming Roxeanne explains:

If this young man wants to be a lawyer, and has yet to be accepted to law school, he will have the joy of explaining this little entanglement with the legal system on every law school application that he fills out. When he sits for the bar exam and attempts to be licensed in a state, he must also disclose this, in sufficient detail to enable the Character and Fitness committees to determine if he should be set loose upon the country with the ability to practise law. None of those various procedures require one to disclose whether or not one’s father is a cult leader; however, every personal encounter with the legal system must be discussed.

Or as the Sage has tried to explain to Groo: Brains before swords.

Speaking of oddities, Cardinal of the Archdiocese of the Rightosphere? Well I am passing the collection plate a bit these days.