My thoughts from last year are here.
Archive for the ‘Blame Bush’ Category
Ditto to Gateway and Jules Crittenden
Posted: January 21, 2010 by datechguy in Blame Bush, opinion/newsTags: bush nostalga, history
Baldilocks says out loud…
Posted: November 9, 2009 by datechguy in Blame Bush, opinion/newsTags: Ft Hood, george w. bush, honor, obama, reality
what many are thinking:
Even if one were inclined to give President Obama the benefit of the doubt and assume that he had asked Former President Bush and Mrs. Bush to visit the wounded soldiers because the Bushes live in Texas, why would he ask this of his predecessor and not get on Air Force One overnight to get down there himself?
Why would he not go to be with those whom he is charged to send into battle and who were so horrifyingly betrayed by one of their own?
Because he doesn’t give a rat’s backside, that’s why not.
Sad to say this is a reasonable conclusion.
I guess that’s 8 not counting the last one
Posted: October 22, 2009 by datechguy in Blame Bush, opinion/newsTags: double standards, MSM, reality, still angry left
Take a look at this USA today opinion piece on rancor in political debate:
It closes with this line about the author:
Sandy Grady, who has covered eight presidential campaigns, is a member of USA TODAY’s board of contributors.
Read the whole thing and see if you can find what is missing. It it’s too tough to do so then check out the comments, a particular one includes several links to help you out:
Do these people even pretend to know that the internet, video recording and audio recordings exist and have been invented?
Barack Obama: Christianist?
Posted: October 21, 2009 by datechguy in Blame Bush, internet/free speechTags: andrew sullivan, free speech, going kryten, irony, obamacult, reality, religion
Here comes that Kryten moment for those on the left (Hi Andrew) who were sure that George Bush was going to impose a religious test for free speech:
While attracting surprisingly little attention, the Obama administration supported the effort of largely Muslim nations in the U.N. Human Rights Council to recognize exceptions to free speech for any “negative racial and religious stereotyping.” The exception was made as part of a resolution supporting free speech that passed this month, but it is the exception, not the rule that worries civil libertarians. Though the resolution was passed unanimously, European and developing countries made it clear that they remain at odds on the issue of protecting religions from criticism. It is viewed as a transparent bid to appeal to the “Muslim street” and our Arab allies, with the administration seeking greater coexistence through the curtailment of objectionable speech. Though it has no direct enforcement (and is weaker than earlier versions), it is still viewed as a victory for those who sought to juxtapose and balance the rights of speech and religion.
I guess all you folks who took that idiotic Blasphemy challenge (which doesn’t actually work by the way) better watch out for Eric Holder and not Benedict XVI or George Bush.
To steal a line from Glenn from who this comes… They told me that if I supported Sarah Palin that free speech would be suppressed in favor of religious speech and they were right!
If there was ever a time that we will find out if the Obamacult is real this is it.


