Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

This whole government overreaction to the Coronavirus pandemic has proved that the only way government can minimize risk is by minimizing freedom.   There is no other way for governments to minimize risk.  These lockdowns by states and municipalities, which are meant to minimize the risks associated with a supposedly deadly virus spreading wildly throughout their population, have resulted in the almost total loss of freedom for the majority of individuals living in this country.  This loss of freedom has resulted in tremendous harm to the individuals who have lost freedom and to the country as a whole.

Exercising your freedom naturally results in some form of risk.  It is something we as individuals all understand.  Throughout every day we make decisions based on this fundamental truth. We weigh the risks versus the benefits every time we decide to exercise out freedom.  The only person qualified to weigh the risks of exercising our freedom is each and every individual. 

An honest and thorough investigation of history will confirm that when government, even at the most local, attempts to decide for others which risks are more acceptable than others, government does a terrible job.  California, New York, and Massachusetts, with their disastrous lockdowns, have proved that governors of states do a tremendously poor job making these decisions for us.  It is far worse for every individual in the United States when the Federal Government attempts to minimize risk for us.  We should all be extremely grateful that President Trump followed the Constitution and did not lockdown the entire country.

Freedom used to be a concept that was universally cherished by everyone in this nation.  Sadly that no longer is true thanks to the brainwashing that has been taking place in our colleges and universities for decades.  Far too many individuals meekly accept the freedom destroying restrictions placed on them to minimize the risks associated with Coronavirus.  It turns out that Coronavirus is far less deadly than the media and so called experts make it out to be.  Even if it was far deadlier than it actually is that would not justify any freedom destroying restrictions.   Earlier generations would not have put up with these restrictions.

Any questions?

The easy Trump / Covid piece vs the accurate one.

Posted: October 6, 2020 by datechguy in Uncategorized

Yesterday I was trying to figure out what I wanted to write when inspiration finally came and I quickly came up with a piece called:

Thank God for Dems that BLM Confers COVID Immunity

It came to me quickly and went like this:

A few days ago I saw this tweet on twitter from Juanita Broadrick:

and prior to this I remember this tweet

I thought nothing of it until I saw this story:

Officials for the City of Cleveland said 11 cases of the Wuhan coronavirus could be traced back to the Sept. 29 presidential debate. The cases were a result of debate pre-planning and set-up, with the majority of cases impacting out-of-state travelers, particularly debate organizers and members of the media.

The news comes after President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump tested positive for the virus. Out of an abundance of caution, the president was transported to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Friday.

I found that interesting as I did this:

Even though 11 cases were traced back to the pre-debate planning, the Cleveland Clinic made one thing clear: every single person with credentials who went into the debate had to have a negative Wuhan coronavirus test. 

That would suggest it could have been part of the people setting up and preparing, but the real question I had was this:

If all the cases originated from the debate, how is it that only the GOP seems to be getting COVID from it?

That question would seem to give some credence to the tweets above, until I remembered that our Democrat friends have likely all marched with BLM at one point or another.

Since it’s been clearly established by all the health experts that being in large crowds for a riot or BLM protest confers automatic immunity from the disease naturally nobody on the left side of the aisle would be affected by any such outbreak from the debate

So we must conclude in the face of that fact that despite the suspicions of those who have seen this administration in general and this president in particularly attacked relentlessly from day one, the fact that this is going though only the GOP side of the aisle from the debate is entirely and completely coincidental.

That’s the piece. It sounds good, it’s got that little bit of sarcastic punch and given that traffic has been a tad slow lately might be just the thing to bring in clicks.

The problem is that I went to lunch with dawife directly after writing it and my brain kicked into gear after the 1st meal of the day and it took very little thought to realize that while it might have a lot of potential as clickbait it just wasn’t true.

The reason people are quarantined for two weeks after covid is because it can take that long for the virus to show up on a test. The reason it takes so long is not because you don’t HAVE the virus until you test positive, but because it can take that long for the virus to multiply to the point where it will show up and/or cause symptoms.

This means that while the President anounced his positive COVID test on Friday the 2nd. The exposure that cause those positive test was not likely from the Sept 29th debate but from a period 10-14 days before sometime between the 18th (Ginsberg’s death day) & 21st of the month.

Here is the President’s schedule Sept 18th, 19th, 20th & 21st looking at said schedule and remember that POTUS seemed to test positive 1st my thought would be either the press briefing or the golf course as the likely sources since that would bring him into contact with folks he normally might not hang with.

And we also have to consider that the 1st lady might have gotten it 1st and gave it to POTUS rather than the other way around. I don’t have the 1st lady’s schedule handy and there doesn’t seem to be a site that tracks it. So I don’t have an indication of where it might have come from if she is the source.

Bottom line: While it’s not impossible that there was some nasty involved and as I said the betting odds for maliciousness vs foolishness or even the normal course of a virus have never been closer I simply don’t see anything that would suggest anything more than a virus being a virus.

So while it’s more spicy to suggest some kind of plot her I think we should just use our heads and rather than searching for some kind of plot that involves taking advantage of those who don’t know how a virus works let’s just wish President Trump and the 1st lady the best and go from there.

We’ll leave the pedaling BS for profit to the Lincoln project and the MSM.

There is a lot of talk about about voter fraud particularly with the new James O’Keefe videos documenting it in Minneapolis. I thought it best to remind you that if you were surprised by any of it, you didn’t pay attention last time.

Originally published Nov 18th 2016

One of the most important things that drive decision making is the risk/reward factor. Is the reward for an action worth the risk being taken by doing it?

This is also true for crime. Unless you are talking a crime of passion or a person high out of their min a smart criminal will look at the risk of being caught, the risk of a particular punishment and weigh it against the reward of success

And that brings us to an important election postmortem that nobody wants to talk about.

There was plenty of talk about a “rigged” system before the election and one of the biggest signs of it was certain big city Democrat counties holding back reporting in key states.

The basic idea which has been part of the equation as long as machine politics has existed, is pretty simple and involves this little algorithm

If (Number of votes you can get away stealing) > (Number of votes you might lose by) Then

Go For it!

Else

Release your vote totals as is

Endif

I submit and suggest that this more than anything else drove the calling of certain formally blue states.  Once it was determined they just plain couldn’t steal enough to overcome the Trump wave there they allowed the numbers to go out.

But while the Democrat machines were ready in places like Florida and North Carolina, places Hillary knew would be close, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and to a lesser extent Pennsylvania were not so prepared. Pennsylvania for example had been considered fools gold for the GOP for so long that last minute moves by the Democrats were almost pro-forma, but it didn’t stop scenes like this:

So provisional ballots are the reason that MSNBC isn’t calling Pennsylvania. This is why I found being forced to fill out a provisional ballot today so suspect. Reiterating: I had to fill one out because, according to the story told to me by the poll workers, I had been sent a vote by mail ballot, which I had never requested. Votes that are counted after election night are the Devil’s Playground for fraud. All kinds of things can happen, and they are almost never good for the Republican candidate.

I’ll wager there were a lot of Trump votes in those provisional ballots that cancelled out one mailed in for them.

Meanwhile Democrat Bosses in Wisconsin Michigan and Minnesota had no inkling that the election was close, that being the case there was no reason why, in an age where proof of a federal offense is a cell phone video away, Dem bosses in Detroit or elsewhere felt the need to take any risk.  They figured those states were won (and they were right about Minnesota) and by election night it was too late to change it.

However that won’t be the case in 2020,  I’ll wager that in 2020 the bosses in Milwaukee, Detroit, Madison and elsewhere will be ready, we’ll see plenty of mail in ballots and absentee ballots that we didn’t see before in those states and plenty of voters looking to go for the GOP will be in the same spot that Steven Kruiser was on election night.

We have four years to prepare for this so we’d better get ready because as our friends on the left have demonstrated in the past, they play for keeps.

After all you don’t think Soros has been quietly sinking millions into AG races, you know the people who would be protesting election fraud on a local level, just because it’s fun?

You have all been warned