Says Donny Deutsch on Morning Joe.

Really? I maintain that the casualty is this credibility of the NAACP who as I wrote in my examiner article was the only player in this game that actually had complete information and choose for the sake of a few hours expediency to ignore it.

The administration didn’t do so well either, although the profuse apologies help mitigate it it is a problem. That’s why they are so desperate for her to take a job. Every day she no longer works for the administration and is on camera reminds them is a day where the public is reminded who fired her.

This contrasts with Breitbart. The 22% media which never liked him is instead of ignoring him (their default position) is alternatively hitting him or talking to him on camera, giving him not only page views but allows him to make his case concerning both the media and NAACP.

Oh and the problem with Rick Moran’s argument? He ignores the actual 23 paragraph article that the videos were part of. Like many at the start I saw only the video. As the story progressed I returned to what was actually written to see the case it made. In fact not only is the story ignored but so is the second clip and the big point he was making.

But hey I could be wrong, check out Moran’s memeorandum thread to see what the others think and make up your own mind.

is just plain ignorant.

What more needs to be said?

…who when asked himself on a matter of national interest gives such a response?

If you are in the business of asking people questions for a living I would think you should not be so shy about answering them.

Here’s one for Doctor Helen…

Posted: July 22, 2010 by datechguy in oddities
Tags:

I know a fellow who is estranged from his wife, during the course of their estrangement an order was put against him forbidding contact.

A few days ago he got a text from her, being a wise fellow he instantly called the court in her state and found out several things.

1. He has in fact been divorced for two months without his knowledge and for a mere $8 he can get a copy of the divorce decree.

2. He then asked about the text message and was told that she was allowed to text him to whatever extent she wants. If however he answers he is in violation.

Am I the only person who sees an inconsistency in this?