His web site is here.
Posts Tagged ‘election 2010’
voices of the candidates Cj Ferry 7th Bristol
Posted: November 2, 2010 by datechguy in elections, politicsTags: 2010 elections, 7th bristol, cj ferry, election 2010, massachusetts elections
First Report Fitchburg Ward 6 7:58 a.m.
Posted: November 2, 2010 by datechguy in elections, local stuff, opinion/news, politicsTags: 2010 elections, big red wave, election 2010, fitchburg, massachusetts elections
There were over 100 votes between A & B already and a very steady stream of voters
This is the first time I’ve ever seen poll watchers
Two years ago I was the lonely person holding a sign for McCain and Palin. today there were 5 people holding republican signs and a single person holding one sign…for Sheriff.
If this is being repeated all over the state then democrats….Be Afraid, be very afraid!
Update: yup is should have said AM
If Charlie Baker fails to win today it will be for this reason…
Posted: November 2, 2010 by datechguy in elections, opinion/news, politicsTags: 2010 election, catholic, charlie baker, election 2010, mcfl, mortal sin, Tim Cahill, wheel of fish award
I talked to people at Mass and at the K of C yesterday and I was very surprised to hear so much support for Tim Cahill…until I read this:
“As you know, the MCFL State PAC endorsed Tim Cahill for Governor last spring. Tim answered our questionnaire 100% pro-life. He pledged to opt out of the abortion funding in Obamacare. We were pleased for our people to have someone for whom to vote because the other candidates hold aggressively pro-abortion positions.
“Unfortunately, Charlie Baker is still (in his own words) ‘to the left of Barack Obama on social issues’ and Deval Patrick has never been for life.
Occasionally there is a race with candidates whose positions are so stridently pro-abortion that no one in conscience can vote for them. That is the case with Baker and Patrick.
Let me follow up with a pronouncement by the Pope:
… Pastors should remind the faithful of their duty to use their votes to advance the common good. He said when political platforms consider decriminalizing abortion, democracy itself is undermined and “betrayed at its very roots.”
Do I think that Tim Cahill’s abortion platform is for expedience, yup. Could his abortion support in the first place been expedience? Yup, I’ve seen many Catholic Pols shift on abortion and gay marriage in order to move up in the democratic party which is perceived as the only game in town. Now lets again go over the rules for Mortal Sin:
1. Grave Matter (Abortion? Yup)
2. Full Knowledge (Do I know the candidate supports abortion and there is no pro-life alternative?)
3. Done Deliberately (Knowing the two above do I still make that vote advancing abortion?)
I’ve talked to many voters who are planning on the full republican ticket except at the top. It confused me until yesterday when for the first time one of them mentioned abortion. I must confess until yesterday I was totally unaware of this issue (which doesn’t reflect well on me).
I am a Catholic Blogger, a VERY Catholic blogger. Like all members of the Knights of Columbus when I say the pledge at the very end I add the words “Born and Unborn”. I was considering the situation (if the pro life candidate is non-viable is choosing between two pro-abortion candidates allowed?) when I looked at the comments on that Red State post hitting MCFL and at Universal Hub cheering abortion.
One of the reasons why I became a republican is because As a Catholic who you know actually BELIEVES in Catholicism The democratic party brands me a racist, bigot, sexist, homophobic etc etc etc. Reading the comments at those two sites brought back memories of those halcyon days.
For this I give as a gift to those sites the Wheel of Fish award:
Tim Cahill ran as an independent because he believed that “Republican” would always be a dirty word in Massachusetts, that was true until it wasn’t. The same holds true with abortion. It will be a pro-abortion state until it is not.
And I repeat and if Charlie Baker loses this race today, this is the reason.
That loud denial from Lisa Murkowski
Posted: November 1, 2010 by datechguy in congress, elections, politicsTags: 2010 elections, alaska senate, election 2010, lisa murkowski
Apparently the other statement didn’t do much good for her poll numbers:
“I have caucused with the Republicans in the past, I will be caucusing with the Republicans when I go back in January,” said Murkowski in a phone interview, responding to recent news reports speculating whether she’d buck the party, and comments Murkowski made over the weekend saying that if elected, she would represent Alaska before the Republican Party.
Is it going to be enough to make a difference? I wouldn’t bet a whole lot of money on it, but I must confess I like the spelling bee commercial, I think it’s cute and effective.


