It looks like This is not going to go away. Darren Hutchinson is hot and angry and shows no signs of backing down:
But this forms the basis of the charge of hypocrisy. Human rights groups detailed in numerous policy statements the specific aspects of Bush’s program with which they disagreed. These practices certainly included rendition to torture and indefinite detention, but they also involved the lack of judicial oversight and denial of access to counsel. If liberals now believe that some activists overreached by criticizing the lack of judicial oversight or legal representation in their arguments condemning Bush, then they should express this point. It is absolutely disingenuous to argue instead that human rights groups only disagreed with rendition to torture and indefinite detention, when the organizations’ own words demonstrate that they made a fuller set of arguments.
Furthermore, describing Bush’s plan as “extraordinary” does very little to defend “rendition” in the Obama administration. Labels do not give rise to human rights violations. Specific practices do.
This back and forth is going to be interesting to re-visit at the end of the Obama Presidency.



Hi. Thanks for the link. And I agree — we have to monitor this and do a re-cap, but earlier than the end of the presidency…..
Well said. The “honorable left” category tag on my blog is made for a person like you, who puts his standards before political loyalties.