…lots of depressing posts today, so go here and cheer up.
Archive for February, 2009
The American Papist reports that the timing of the disclosures on the Legionaries of Christ’s founder was not a coincidence:
My contacts assert that the convergence of these two big news events–the outrage prompted by the Bishop Willliamson affair, followed shortly afterwards by the new revelations regarding Father Maciel’s “double life” — was no accident: the order’s superiors and their ecclesial allies took advantage of the crisis surrounding Bishop Williamson to minimize the impact of the new disclosures regarding Maciel. The Mexican superiors, I’m told, believe the present tempest will blow over and the Legion will pull itself together and go on as before. (The Cathoholic – updated 3:30pm)
It certainly seems that amidst the hubbub surrounding the SSPX story, coverage of the Maciel scandal has been slim-to-none, except for the notable exceptions chronicled on these pages.
In terms of PR that is a normal move when trying to dilute damage. However if your goal is truth and pastoral healing dodging the issue is a bad idea.
Update: Damion Thomspon says this isn’t going away:
I wrote yesterday about Fr Maciel, a Mexican whom the Legionaries and their lay wing, Regnum Christi, had virtually canonised before he died. Big mistake: not only did he sexually abuse male seminarians, but we’ve just learned that he fathered a baby girl in his 80s.
Several Legionary priests are disgusted by the way their leaders defended Maciel – it seems like they must have known that he was living a double life. Meanwhile, many Regnum Christi members are behaving like shocked members of a cult, still saying prayers based around the mission and charism of their founder.
He points out why this isn’t pushed in the media:
This scandal is potentially bigger than the SSPX fiasco. The media have given it little attention – perhaps because it offers little opportunity for Pope-bashing: it was Benedict who sent the Legion’s sexually predatory founder, the late Fr Marcial Maciel, into exile in 2006.
He links to George Weigel who goes the whole hog:
None of these questions can be thoughtfully or prayerfully answered until there is a full audit.
And, as the flailings and failures of the past ten days have made clear, that audit cannot be conducted by the Legion leadership, which is likely beset by a maelstrom of internal and external pressures. It must be mandated by the pope, and it must be conducted by someone responsible to the pope alone—not responsible to the relevant parts of the Vatican bureaucracy, not responsible to the cardinal secretary of state, but responsible to the pope alone. There is simply no other way open to an accounting that will be both scrupulously honest and publicly credible.
To take an image from corporate law, the Legion of Christ must be immediately put into receivership: A personal delegate, appointed by the pope, must be empowered to take over the governance of the Legion of Christ and to conduct the moral and institutional audit required. The papal delegate would be instructed to report his findings, both interim and final, to the pope alone, and he would be instructed to make recommendations (again, to the pope alone) addressing the possible futures, including dissolution or dissolution-and-reconstitution, of the Legion.
I’m still getting fundraisers from them. My recycle bins will remain full until this stuff gets fixed, and honestly I instinctively don’t trust any religious group that promotes itself via sweepstakes.
She must be destroyed!
Posted: February 12, 2009 by datechguy in catholic, opinion/newsTags: I wish I said that, reality, religion
I was listening to Fr. Corapi who stated in one of his talks about spiritual warfare that once you become a threat to Satan you become a target.
Judging from some of the comments at this YouTube video this young lady is a threat indeed.
Via Hotair: Much more positive commentary here, here, here, here and here.
If you want a message from an adult instead check this out via the raving atheist:
Update: Comments needed to be shut off on that youtube post:
We apologize for turning off the commenting functionality. This was not to stop genuine discussion or debate on the issue but was, rather, a response to the cowardly who used it as an opportunity to throw insults and threats at a young girl that they hated without reason. Thank-you to everyone who, whether in agreement or not, has responded in a respectful manner.
Must have been a lot of Huffington post commentators.
UPDATE: Welcome Don Suber readers. Take a peek around. Be amazed at the shock of Catholics being Catholic, See what a difference that $76 dollars will make, see how defying environmental rules can save your life see the president dance the little sidestep, and remember if you have need of remote tech support, I offer it here.
$600 won’t help, $676 will however
Posted: February 12, 2009 by datechguy in opinion/newsTags: double standards, economy, obama
What is the difference between stimulus that won’t make a difference and stimulus that will save the economy? Apparently $76 bucks a year.
Via the Anchoress Michelle Obama July 11th 2008
“You’re getting $600. What can you do with that? Not to be ungrateful or anything. But maybe it pays down a bill, but it doesn’t pay down every bill every month..
Barack’s approach is that the short-term quick fix kinda stuff sounds good. And it may even feel good that first month when you get that check. And then you go out and you buy a pair of earrings.”
Apparently this is no longer the case:
Here is our 800 billion dollar stimulus mostly-spending bill we must see passed, and we must gratefully accept as the only possible solution to our “catastrophic” problems and our growing malaise. The ONLY solution.
This other one, over here, brought up by another Democrat? Ignored. Just ignored.
I just have one thing to ask:
What does Michelle Obama suggest we do – how we will stimulate the economy with our $13?
The $13 a week adds up to $676 a year. There are a lot of people who don’t think this will help, I don’t think it will hurt, but I think a lump sum would have a bigger economic effect.
It’s amazing what $76 dollars will do for an economy. Michelle Malkin notices this too and asks:
What sayeth Mrs. Obama now?
Apparently she was against this before she was for it.


