Hi, Peter’s readers.
I have something I want to share with you at my place. Peter said I could tell you about it here. Please visit:
The Battle Ax Blog
https://axzilla.news.blog/2023/04/20/god-bless-the-advocates/
Peace be with you.
Hi, Peter’s readers.
I have something I want to share with you at my place. Peter said I could tell you about it here. Please visit:
The Battle Ax Blog
https://axzilla.news.blog/2023/04/20/god-bless-the-advocates/
Peace be with you.
The political left has long been infected with Marxist teachings and philosophies. No political ideologies have caused more carnage than those of Karl Marx. The most despicable aspect of the teachings of this long dead psychopath is the willingness of its practitioners to infect children with the their destructive teachings.
Transgenderism is the most harmful of all the cultural Marxist schemes ever invented. It is absolutely unconscionable that children are targeted for gender transition and genital mutilation.
The Democrats in Washington State have taken this insanity to a whole new level.
Washington state passed a bill allowing children to legally be taken away from their parents for not consenting to gender transition procedures on their child.
According to Senate Bill 5599, shelters could contact the Department of Children, Youth, and Families instead of parents for minors seeking reproductive health services or gender-affirming care.
The proposal would pave the way for more of a “compelling reason” to conceal a child who seeks sex change operations or reproductive health services such as abortion.
Parental consent is one of the cornerstones of our constitutional and legal system. The political left have always despised this. They believe that only the almighty State should have the power and authority to raise children.
State Senate Republican Leader John Braun said the troubling legislation “clears the way” for kids to “game the system” by taking away parent’s God-given rights.
“The only thing SB 5599 would do is cause harm by driving a wedge between vulnerable kids and their parents, at a time when a teen lacks the perception and judgment to make critical life-altering decisions,” Braun said. “A parent may not even know why the child ran away and could involve law enforcement or other groups in a desperate search… all the while going through an unnecessary emotional nightmare, imagining the worst about what might have happened.”
This next article really made my blood boil, Gender Surgeon Promotes ‘Eunuch’ Gender Identity For Kids – Louder With Crowder
This TikTok famous doctor wants us all to know about yet another gender identity for children. Because we just don’t have enough. And this one may just be the most disturbing to date.
Miami-based Dr. Sidhbh Gallagher has gone viral in the past for her “yeet the teet” videos, where she celebrates cutting off the healthy breasts of adolescent girls. In this newest viral clip, Gallagher explains how a “eunuch” is someone “who is assigned male at birth but may not be comfortable with the masculine features.”
Gallagher describes eunuchs as “gender-diverse individuals,” and claims they may benefit from “gender-affirming care,” like orchiectomy. Which is the surgical removal of the testes. She created the video to answer a question about someone who may want to remove their testicles even if they aren’t transgender.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: [discussing a candidate for a Bishopric} And he’s also against oppression and persecution in Africa.
Prime Minister Jim Hacker: So are we
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Yes, but he’s against it when practiced by black governments as well as white ones.
Prime Minister Jim Hacker: Oh, you mean he’s a racist.
Yes Prime Minister: The Bishop’s Gambit 1986
A while back Robert Stacy McCain wrote about where the state of South Africa under the ANC was doing wrong
Property rights are the basis of all economic advancement. People will not work to create wealth unless they can be sure that they will own what they have created. The protection of private property is therefore one of the most basic functions of government. If a government begins to threaten the “rich” with expropriation (or confiscatory taxes), this will cause a shortage of capital, as those with wealth will leave the country, and foreign investment will dry up. Within a short time, a relatively rich country can be plunged into poverty, as has happened in Venezuela. The consequences of Ramaphosa’s anti-white policies are predictable: The white minority in South Africa will flee, tourism and foreign investment will decline, and South Africa will descend into poverty and violence.
About 20,000 white South Africans leave the country every year, and white people are now less than 9% of the country’s population. The Ramaphosa government’s idea that it can help black people by seizing the property of whites will yield little benefit to those it claims to “help,” since the value of farmland will decline because whites will no longer be willing to buy farms, when their purchases might be seized from them. And as net out-migration by whites can be expected to increase as a consequence of the government’s anti-white hostility, there would be fewer potential white buyers for farms anyway. Real estate values in South Africa are likely to plummet. But if socialists were capable of understanding the consequences of their policies, they wouldn’t be socialists, would they?
And where it was was heading:
James Madison here describes the origins of political division as a matter of people freely pursuing their own interests. The basic job of government is the protection of property rights, and notice that Madison assumes that “different and unequal faculties” will result in people having “different degrees and kinds of property.” No matter what the government may do, this cannot be avoided in a free society. The problem we see in South Africa is that too many people there (as here) were led to believe otherwise and, nearly three decades after the end of apartheid, the failure of the false promise of “equality” produces an irrational rage among those who feel they have been cheated out of something.
Well its five years later and and here is the report of an expat returned to South Africa after a decade and didn’t like what he saw was not pleasant
Besides no airlines, no postal service and no trains, there is a dwindling electricity supply. They have rolling blackouts, euphemistically called “load shedding” which can last as much as 10 hours per day in Cape Town. Johannesburg is worse. People survive by always keeping their thermos flasks filled with hot water, using small gas camping stoves and using rechargeable lanterns for light and a healthy supply of batteries and candles at all times. Food rots in refrigerators so one needs to purchase small amounts of groceries just for a day. Few people can afford to have a generator, let alone the exorbitant cost of diesel fuel. Without electricity there is no viable economy. Retail stores, restaurants, businesses and factories cannot operate. The employees are idle and cannot do their job. As a result they are unable to earn a livelihood. The lack of electricity is a complex topic. In a nutshell, a history of huge financial losses, mismanagement, sabotage and corruption is evident.
Well at least there is equality…of misery:
There have always been people begging on the streets; mostly blacks. Now however, they are joined by ever-increasing white beggars. I did see an entire family including small blond haired children with crude cardboard signs saying “Please help – God bless you” .
According to some reports, over 50% of South Africans live in poverty on less than $2.00 a day. Some have no access to sanitation, water or electricity.
Where is this heading? Well when Zimbabwe did the same thing you actually had people pining for the days of white rule, but the problem here isn’t race, as Insty pointed out years ago:
It’s not black rule. Botswana next door is well-run. It’s rule by leftists, which always makes everything suck. And they always use race as an excuse for their failures. You can see that in the deep-Blue parts of the United States.
It’s the type of stuff that happens when people ransacking stores in Chicago and the mayor elect is unwilling to condemn it or describe it as “A mass protect against poverty and segregation”
And it’s not just majority black cities in the US heading in this direction, Portland Oregon is going there too.
The once idyllic city has descended into chaos, and all the happy talk from 2020 has led to this. Rather than affirming the rule of law and the norms of civilization, the leaders of Oregon and Portland decided to cede the city to the savages, and the savages accepted the invitation and moved in to build their version of society.
Marxism, whoever and wherever it’s tried, the result is the same