Archive for December 10, 2023

By John Ruberry

For many Netflix subscribers, their focus is on the next week’s release of the second part of the final season of The Crown. While I have enjoyed the series, the first batch of Season Six of The Crown was a huge disappointment for me.

A more enjoyable use of your time–75 minutes to be precise–can be found by watching Radical Wolfe, a documentary about the legendary writer Tom Wolfe, a pioneer of the New Journalism movement of the 1960s who later, and seamlessly, made the transition into fiction, penning one of the greatest novels ever, The Bonfire of the Vanities.

Radical Wolfe, which had a brief theatrical run this autumn, is directed by Richard Dewey. It is filled with interviews of Wolfe; Jon Hamm narrates passages from Wolfe’s work. The documentary is based on an Esquire article by Michael Lewis.

Gay Talese, Tom Junod, Christopher Buckley, and Lewis are among the writers interviewed for Radical Wolfe.

Buckley’s father, conservative firebrand William F. Buckley, says here. “Tom Wolfe is probably the most skillful writer in America. I mean by that is that he can do more things with words than anyone else.”

“If you want to be a writer,” Wolfe, who died in 2018 said of himself, “you’ve got to be standing in the middle of the tracks to see how fast the train goes.”

“Nobody is writing like Tom Wolfe today,” Junod says in Radical Wolfe. “And no one has written like Tom Wolfe.”

Wolfe is someone America needs now. Oh, to have seen him running loose among the hypocrites at COP28.

The title of the film comes from Wolfe’s 1970 essay for New York magazine, Radical Chic: That Party at Lenny’s, when Wolfe, after co-opting an invitation to a fundraiser for bail money for some Black Panthers held at Leonard Bernstein’s Park Avenue home, skewered the liberal virtue signaling culture, even before that term existed.

Oh yeah, phrases. Phrases!!! Besides “radical chic,” Wolfe coined the terms “the right stuff,” the title of his of his rollicking yet informative bestseller about the early days of the space program, and “masters of the universe,” the group that Sherman McCoy, the lead character in The Bonfire of the Vanities, placed himself in. 

Not mentioned in the documentary while Wolfe didn’t create the now-common phrase “pushing the envelope,” which is used repeatedly in The Right Stuff, he popularized it.

Wolfe began his career as a who-what-where when-why–journalist in the northeast. After convincing Esquire in the early 1960s to let him write an article about the California custom car culture, Wolfe suffered writer’s block. Which was the best thing, career-wise, that ever happened to the author. Eventually the floodgates opened, Wolfe brought sound effects to print journalism, shown in the title of that piece, There Goes (Varoom! Varoom!) That Kandy-Kolored (Thphhhhhh!) Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby (Rahghhh!) Around the Bend (Brummmmmmmmmmmmmmm)…

The repeated use of ellipses (…) and multiple exclamation points (!!!) are a trademark of Wolfe’s early work.

As with the fetid film version of The Bonfire of the Vanities, Radical Wolfe tiptoes around race. Wolfe was a master storyteller and, strictly in the storytelling sense, race presents a crucial ingredient for any narrative–conflict. The Reverend Bacon character in Bonfires, an Al Sharpton knockoff, is a comic foil. Fareek “The Cannon” Fanon, an African American college football star in Wolfe’s 1998 novel, A Man in Full, comes across as a boor when he confuses lead character Charlie Coker’s old moniker as a 60-Minute Man, not as a football starter on both defense and offense, but as a man who could, let’s say, “do it” in bed for 60 minutes.

Black people can be boors in Wolfe’s world. As can white people. As can everyone. That’s the way it ought to be. Because that’s the way society is.

In Wolfe’s takedown of ugly glass-box and faceless architecture, From Bauhaus to Our House, he gives a rundown of the horrors of public housing, and joyously recalls the response when tin-eared bureaucrats in St. Louis–after decades of failing the residents of the city’s housing projects–finally did the unthinkable. They asked the tenants of the notorious Pruitt-Igoe homes, most of them Black, what they wanted done to the buildings. Their response? They chanted, “Blow it up.”

And the bureaucrats did just that. Why isn’t this poignant story in Radical Wolfe?

Wolfe was always coy about his political stance. “I belong to the party of the opposition,” he says in the documentary. But I suspect he was a slightly conservative, with a strong libertarian bent.

Despite the quibbles I mentioned, I loved Radical Wolfe. Oh, one more thing. To capture the Varoom!!! Varoom!!! uniqueness of Wolfe’s genius, a surreal mashup, along the lines of the one in The Life and Death of Peter Sellers, would have been a welcome addition.

Last year, Netflix sent a message to its workers that not all of its programming–not these words of course–will kowtow to wokeism. Radical Wolfe is a big step in the right direction for the streaming service. Next year Netflix will stream a six-episode limited series based on Wolfe’s A Man in Full. It will star Jeff Daniels and Diane Lane.

Keep it up, Netflix.

But I have one more quibble. Radical Wolfe is rated TV-MA for–wait for it–language and smoking.

Really? TV-MA?

Yep.

John Ruberry regularly blogs at Marathon Pundit.

Plot: Earth is going crazy the people are completely polarized can the Doctor, Donna and Unit save the day from one of the Doctor’s oldest foes? Or will he need some help.

Writing: Given Davies statement about pissing off fans I expected the absolute worst from this episode. I’ve never been so pleasantly surprised in my life. This had just about everything. A solid villain, old friends and a bunch of twists and turns to keep you guessing. It seemed both longer than it was and shorter than it should have been and while some of the things seemed recycled it still worked. The penultimate twists I’ll deal with at the end to try to minimize spoilers but put simply, everything worked. If h

Acting: I will be very disappointed if we don’t see Neil Patrick Harris as the Toymaker again, he did his best to steal every scene he was in. Jemima Redgrave’s Kate Stewart was excellent and her performance invoked memories of Nick Courtney (more on that later) Bonnie Lankford was a pleasant surprise and the potential of her Mel as a reoccurring character bodes well. Tennant and Tate continued to shine as for the newest member of the cast, well to steal a line from the 1st Doctor he did well, quite well, perhaps the future is in safe hands.

Best Moment: Lot’s to choose from here but being an old Doctor Who guy I’ll say the reuniting of the Doctor and Mel and her giving the story of coming back to earth.

Worst Moment: The Doctor’s speech inviting the Toymaker to travel with him seemed completely recycled from his offer to the Master back in Davies first run.

Annoying moment: This is going to sound odd but unless I missed something there was no apparent reason for the Doctor to realize where the Toymaker’s shop was or where the doll came from.

That’s a shame moment: The realization that Bernard Cribbins didn’t live enough to finish the scenes for this one.

Fun Moment: Donna’s job offer and the negotiation

Nostalgia Moment(s): Return of Mel, Kate Stewart blazing away, the toy store invoked the 8th Doctor Big Finish story Solitaire when the Toymaker fights Charlie in a toyshop. The tooth being picked up like the ring and the list of adventures.

The What’s the Hell’s going on? Moment: That line was seen an awful lot in the last year we finally saw it in action

The “I’ll tell you when Big Finish is canon or not” Moment: There have been at least 3 toymaker stories in Big Finish, one with the 6th that I’ve not heard, one with the 7th with Ace & Hex that was Ok and a companion chronicles with the 8th and Charlie Pollard that was first rate. This episode suggests none of those take place, in fact the very plot of this episode is dependent on them not taking place, although technically on the 8th doctor adventure it’s Charlie not the Doctor who wins the game. So maybe that cancels out the 7th doctor’s win to keep the score even.

The “Where’s Osgood?” moment: Osgood missing from Unit at that moment would seem odd, but then again the resolution might have been too much for her inhaler.

Don’t think for a moment that I didn’t notice: While the Toymaker was going through Smith & Capaldi’s companions none of the companions from the Whitaker era got a mention. Remember Davies was brought on for the 60th anniversary to stop the bleeding of the Whitaker era I suspect that while he’s going to embrace the new canon to show whose boss 13th Doctor instead of being lovingly called “Doctor Karen” is now going to be “She who must not be named.”

The Elephant in the Room Part 3: Are we expected to believe that the Doctor made a trip with Mel to the gilded age and with Donna’s kid to the moon and there was absolutely no alien invasion or deadly menace that happened to show up. Mathematically I guess that’s possible but just sayin…

The (Spock Must Die) Spoiler moment(s): At first I like everyone else assumed Davies had decided to be bold by having the regeneration 3/4 in but instead we got the whole “bi-generation” business. Very original, completely unexpected and it worked. Of course it leaves a lot of questions.

  1. When the Tennant Doctor Finally dies does he
    • Regenerate into The Current 15th doctor?
    • Regeneration into someone else?
    • Just die?
    • Depending on how it happens cause 15 to cease to Exist?
  2. Does Doctor 15 at this moment have all the memories of Doctor 14
    • Up to the moment the bi-generation?
    • To the moment of Doctor 14’s death?
    • Or does he remember them as they happen (See Out of Time Tennant 10 meets Baker’s 4th)
  3. Does this mean that Tennant’s 14th doctor will be a reoccurring character?

And that’s just the start of it. With the Doctor living with Donna’s family doesn’t that make them a sitting target for every enemy looking for revenge? But hey, the War Doctor business brought complications too. We don’t know it all, but that’s OK. We don’t need to.

The a Tad too far moment: The splitting the TARDIS into two, that’s kinda weak, I submit and suggest it didn’t split I think it means that it’s just one TARDIS at different points in it’s timeline.

The Doctor No Pants Moment: What’s with the no-pants stuff? The new doctor is going to get damn cold if he meets the Ice warriors.

Bottom Line: This story is a solid winner and frankly the only one of the three that is worthy as a 60th anniversary special in the sense that it’s more than a regular episode. I think 10 minutes more mixed in here and there might have worked better, but this is a really first class episode and 5 minutes of “Rose” at the dinner table and passing references to things I don’t like doesn’t mess it up.

5 stars.

Ranking in the current season (counting the children in need special) 1st of Four and by an awful lot. Perhaps the idea was to push the agenda heavy in the Star Beast then put it in the background so the increasing quality would sell it but if the Star Beast had been anything near as good as this one there would have been a lot less fuss. But regardless of the reason this one is a class act.

  1. The Giggle
  2. Destination Skaro
  3. The Wild Blue Yonder
  4. The Star Beast

Since we were comparing to the Capaldi years let’s do the same here. Unlike Wild Blue Yonder. This one definitely makes the list but in fifth place. Not because it is bad, but because those four episodes ahead of it were so damn good. I must confess I was close to putting it above the caretaker but that episode was just so damn fun.

1st The Husbands of River Song
2nd World Enough and Time
3rd. Last Christmas 
4th. The Caretaker
5th  The Giggle
6th. Extremis
7th. The Return of Doctor Mysterio
8th. The Girl who Died
9th.  The Witch’s Familiar
10th. Hell Bent

But as it’s a special episode let’s compare Apples to Apples, Specials to specials that I’ve reviewed which are from the Matt Smith and Capaldi Era 4th of 10 although it was a close thing between A Christmas Carol and this one.

1st The Husbands of River Song
2nd The Day of the Doctor
3rd. Last Christmas 
4th. The Giggle
5th  A Christmas Carol
6th.  The Time of the Doctor
7th.  The Return of Doctor Mysterio
8th.  The Snowmen
9th.  The Doctor, the Widow & the Wardrobe
10th. Twice Upon a Time