Prince John: Have you finished?

Robin Hood: I’m only just beginning! From this night on, I’ll use every means in my power to fight you!

The Adventures of Robin Hood 1938

Let’s be blunt.

Apparently none of the institutions, even those controlled by the GOP will stop the steal. All seem intent on playing procedural games. We’ve seen courts say suits filed before the election were not proper because no harm and been done while other claim that suits filed after the fraud were too late.

Apparently the window for getting relief on a stolen election is shorter than the Barnicle Brothers sixty second sale.

And it’s rather clear that no state legislature is willing to face the wrath of the media to use the power given them by the constitution to stop the steal. With God all things are possible but clearly the fear of God which is the beginning of wisdom nor the realization that the media will treat them no better if they act then if they don’t, is not possessed by enough of them to act.

That I should have seen this done in America on a nation scale in my lifetime and that so many seem willing to accept it is a source of deep disappointment to me, but given human nature and the willingness of people to cave to insane COVID restricts it is not all that surprising.

So what should be done?

1. We should on every and all occasions continue to state that the 2020 election has been blatantly stolen
2. We should on every and all occasions from today till January 20th 2024 state for the record that the Biden / Harris administration while legal, is illegitimate.
3. We should take every action short of Sin to resist any attempt to force us to claim or act as if either of the two above statements are false.
4. We should continue to take every action short of sin to continue to expose what has been done and produce evidence of same.
5. We should take every action short of sin to bring down the media and the various tech companies that have aided and abetted these actions
6. We should treat statements by those in media and tech who have protected aided and abetted these action will all the credibility and respect that they deserve, namely none

All of this said we also have to recognize that barring a sudden surge of courage or conscience by the those involved in these monstrous actions legally the Biden Harris administration will likely be in power and act accordingly in matter of law when necessary. while doing all we can, again short of sin, to hinder, stop and destroy their agenda.

One can recognize the reality on the ground without conceding the legitimacy of the situation. Like Chairman Xi of China in Tibet the The Biden Harris administration will have defacto power in the United States and we need to recognize this as needed to function in this society while at the same time proclaiming from the rooftops that the Biden and Harris authority over this country has the same legitimacy as Xi’s over Tibet.

That is none at all.

As of today this is my pinned tweet on Twitter

It's worth noting that if sworn in on January 20th of next year Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will be the 1st President & VP in history to break their oaths of office by the act of taking them. #stopthesteal https://t.co/KwSy4IXB5w

— Peter Ingemi (@DaTechGuyblog) December 28, 2020

Why short of sin? Because nothing a Biden administration does is worth the cost of my soul or yours and to act in contrary to the best results of your soul is exactly what the enemy hopes to achieve by enabling them.

Oh and for the record, the enemy I’m referring to are not the democrats, they’re just, wittingly or unwittingly, working for him.

That when allowing people to steal an election that your voters tend to think it doesn’t matter if they vote.

That when your governor and legislature ignore the wishes of new voters who turned out on election day they decide to stay home.

That people content to steal one election blatantly have no trouble with stealing another.

Or to put it another way the Broken Windows Theory doesn’t just apply to street crime.

About seven years ago Lunenberg Massachusetts became a national story.

A mixed race family with a 8th grade black child on the high school school had graffiti spray-painted on their house with the words “knights don’t need niggers” (the “knights” being the name of the football team) and the town was rocked.

As this was the Obama Deval Patrick years the FBI and state got involved, it was a huge story covered all over the nation and even internationally. The town and school was pilloried, their annual thanksgiving game was forfeited and the season cancelled (and in pre-covid days this was a big deal) The School had all kinds of “diversity” events added. There was a candlelight vigil and “Lunenberg High” became a synonym for racism…

…that is until the investigation took place and some interesting inconsistencies came up particularly with the graffiti itself which oddly was despite supposedly done by a bunch of kids at night managed to be painted only on a surface that was easily painted over while missing spots that would have entailed expense to fix. In the end the investigation pointed to the mother of the boy.

As I said at the time:

Where does the town of Lunenburg go to get their reputation back, where does the football team go to get their Thanksgiving game back and who pays for all the police, local state and federal that were used in the attempt to sell this BS?

And will the sites in Atlanta, Metro US, The UK Daily Mail, Sports Illustrated, Fox Chicago and the Huffington Post be reporting on these new developments with the same gusto?

None of those media outlets were interested in the correction. Only folks like Stacy McCain,

This story immediately came back to mind when I saw this post about the Antifia “vandalism” at Nancy Pelosi’s house:

MORE: "Cancel rent!" and "We want everything!" was written on Speaker Pelosi's garage in big black letters.

The messages have since been covered up with trash bags (PHOTO: @FogCityMidge) https://t.co/kDhIPiFbNT pic.twitter.com/dysuvmMz9T

— KRON4 News (@kron4news) January 2, 2021

Andrea Widburg at the American thinker takes up the story.

Unless the spray can coincidentally stopped spraying paint just as it got to the “three o’clock” side of the circle, it looks very much as if the graffiti artist went out of his (or her) way to protect the bricks from getting paint splashed on it, perhaps by taping off the area before spraying. This care is important because it’s easy to repaint a garage door and “notoriously difficult” to get spray paint off of a porous surface such as brick.

Likewise, the encircled “A” on the left side also has a completely vertical stripe on its “nine o’clock” side, which again looks as if someone held up a barrier to ensure that no paint got on the bricks:

Because as you know Antifa is supercilious concerning how they do their vandalism to minimize the costs of those they hit. She closes thus:

It’s entirely possible that this was an Antifa effort and the person spraying paint had some residual compassion for Pelosi. But it’s also possible that this is a false flag effort. I am not offering any suggestions as to who might have raised this false flag. I note only what others have pointed out before: Something’s peculiar here. 

I have to disagree, it’s not at all possible. This was an attempt to gain sympathy and empathy and I suspect to put pressure on the far left in congress to provide the votes she needed for speaker from those on the left like the squad which fell into line.

Everything about these people is false, start from this premise and you will no go far wrong.

And this is the verdict, that the light came into the world, but people preferred darkness to light, because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come toward the light, so that his works might not be exposed. But whoever lives the truth comes to the light, so that his works may be clearly seen as done in God.

Jesus Christ John 3:19-21

He sees as well as you do that courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point, which means, at the point of highest reality. A chastity or honesty, or mercy, which yields to danger will be chaste or honest or merciful only on conditions. Pilate was merciful till it became risky.

C. S. Lewis The Screwtape letters #29

As soon as it became apparent that the great steal of 2020 was on and people began objecting to it the left pushed back. This pushback took many forms. The repeated lockouts of my account and false claims about my tweets on Benford’s law followed by repeated false apologies and false claims that they were in error) were one. The repeated line from Twitter when President Trump repeated the various claims was another so many times that’s it’s practically a meme

This Claim about the election is disputed

Twitter, every time President Trump details evidence of Fraud

Another were loud proclamations that all such claims were nonsense so much that media refused to cover hearing and ignored sworn statements that were given, even by the President who presented a summery of the fraud during a speech.

From there we had loud pronouncements that allegations from fraud undermine confidence in American elections and are a dangerous thing in our democracy, in fact it was for this reason that Richard Nixon in 1960 did not contest the stolen election in Illinois that defeated him (and in my opinion led to Watergate 12 years later as a paranoid campaign was taking no chances).

Now that the Senator from Missouri has turned the electoral college challenge by congress is a fact rather than the wet dream that it was for democrats in 2001 2005 & 2017 we are hearing loud cries that this is sedition from the media and left.

This leads to the obvious question:

WHY?

If this election was on the up and up and if the belief currently held by large chunks of Americans that this election was stolen is false then it’s in the interest of the Media, the Democrat, the left and the Tech folks who insist that this is the case that it is clearly demonstrated to be so.

If there were:

• no republican observers hustled out of rooms or kept away from the counts.
• no large amounts of ballots pulled from out of tables once observers left
• No computer systems were hacked or programed to change counts
• No large quantities of ballots marked only for Joe Biden suddenly turning up in the middle of the night in Democrat strongholds
• No widespread use of fraudulent mail ballots in Philadelphia, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Detroit and other cities
• No validity to the claims listed here by state from machines spotting dems 35k votes in Arizona to Xerox copies of military ballots all for Biden in Michigan.

And if those who submitted sworn statements under penalty of perjury were lying in order to change the result of the election then exposing this as a conspiracy theory to the general public is not only in their interest but it would be very easy to prove.

Yet the left and their allies are violently opposed to taking their chance to expose this nonsense for what they claim it is.

I submit and suggest the reason is:

They know it’s not nonsense and also know that if the evidence is showed to the American people it can be easily understood.

“But DaTechGuy”, you ask, “Why then are republicans, particularly those in leadership fight so hard to keep this from happening and objecting to publicly like Senator Pat Toomey foolishly as Dinesh D’Sousa suggests.

No one disputes this “fundamental defining feature” of democracy. Nor is anyone trying to “overturn” election results. The whole point is to accurately ascertain which candidate actually won an electoral majority. Only a very foolish Republican would seek to block that effort https://t.co/no2osKlvZn

— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) January 3, 2021

Dinesh is wrong here. Senator Toomey and those in the GOP like him are not being foolish, he is being cowardly.

If the objection had not taken place, if evidence is never presented to the congress then members of the GOP establishment can function as normal, raise money as normal and retire as normal to comfortable lives for them and theirs in the sure and comfortable knowledge that nobody will cause them any grief as they cash in on their office.

But once it became clear that the objection would take place everything changed. (There’s a reason why the number of house and senate members objecting skyrocketed once it became plain it was going to happen)

If evidence is presented publicly to the senate and is in fact convincing and they are forced to acknowledge it as such then a choice must be made. Do you risk your their political future by acting on this evidence angering the deep state which might be unforgiving when it comes time to sit on boards, take cushy jobs at universities or even cash in as a public speaker?

Or do they like Pilate decide that it’s too risky, do they reject the evidence and the risk of the wrath of voters while earning the love of the deep state and the preservation of their prerogatives that they were so looking forward to?

One will never grow poor betting on cowardice from public servants but there is a chance but a chance that they will choose to do the right thing.

Cue the 11th Doctor: