Government advocate: One thousand five hundred and sixteen casualties with one thousand six hundred and fifty bullets.
Gen. Dyer: My intention was to inflict a lesson that would have an impact throughout all India.

Gandhi 1982

Monday Morning on Special Report with Brett Baier a representative of the Palestinians claimed in US television that Israel was deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians.

If you are ignorant enough you can look at the 500 dead (as of this writing) in Gaza you might fall for this line, but I’d like to introduce you to a witness who can without question prove the falsehood of this claim: The late General Reginald Dwyer.

95 years ago on April 13th 1919 General Dwyer led a contingent of about 90 men to Jallianwala Bagh where there was a large crowd of Indians some for protest and some for a local fair.

After deploying 50 of his men armed with bolt action Lee Enfield Rifles (First introduced in 1895) he opened fire on the crowd.  After expending aprox 1650 rounds his troops managed to inflict over 1500 casualties on the crowd with between 379 & 1000 dead depending on whose figures you believe.

Dyer never for one moment denied that he was deliberately targeting unarmed civilians, in fact Dyer actually had armored cars armed with machine guns but he was unable to bring them to bear. At the official inquiry he bluntly stated publicly that had he been able to deploy them he would have used them.

The scene was vividly portrayed in the 1982 movie Gandhi

This event is known as the Amritsar or the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.  It was a key moment in the Indian Independence movement.

What does this have to do with Gaza? Consider.

General Dwyer had 50 armed men, using 19th century bolt-action rifles and in only 15 minutes of deliberately targeting a civilian population inflicted 1500 casualties.

Israel has called up 40,000 men, they have deployed, jets, heavy artillery, tanks and all the weapons that a modern experienced 21st century army has at its disposal. For five days (as of this writing on Monday night) they have been fighting directly in Gaza and for several days before this, Israel was launching air and artillery strikes on Gaza.

Furthermore they are operating in an area where 1.8 million people live in an area of 139 square miles. A density of over 13,000 people per square mile.

So consider, if we are to believe the Arabs who are claiming on twitter, Facebook , in the Arab media and in front of every western camera that is put in front of them that Israel is deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians since day 1 , we have to conclude that the Israeli Army and Air Force, given a full week, are less efficient killers than 50 British soldiers armed with bolt-action rifles, introduced when Grover Cleveland was President of the United States, were in 15 minutes.

General Dyer, the dead of Amritsar and simple logic call such claims a nonsensical lie.

If however you still maintain the Palestinian/Arab line for anything other than political or social reasons I suggest installing a high quality e-mail filter because hundreds of Nigerian e-mail scammers are simply dying to meet you.

One of the most common pieces of idiocy I hear over and over on the net is the idea that there was some kind of grand conspiracy of the Catholic Church to keep the Bible out of the hands of the masses that was only foiled with the invention of the printing press by Gutenberg. This idiotic tweet is standard:

@DaTechGuyblog @JasonReinhardt7 @legioviferrata 2 finish WHO would dare keep Bible secret & persecute people who read it 4 millennia Any1?

— CassTete (@CassTete1) July 19, 2014

The amount of historical ignorance it takes to make such a claim is so astounding that one is shocked that a person would be willing to make it in public, but since people know so little of history let me suggest a simple experiment to illustrate the absurdity of it all.

The next time someone tells you this tripe, ask them to do the following.

1. Sit yourself down in front of their  laptop and open up your bible.

2. Starting from Genesis start typing the entire thing out including verse numbers

The new Testament contains 138,020 words in 7956 verses. As you are including the verse numbers that’s an extra word for every say 3 verses so add 2652 words for a total of 140,682.

Now because a person making such a claim is likely a protestant we’ll make the old testament easy by doing what Martin Luther did and lop off the books he didn’t like leaving you 602,585. To make things easier we’ll even excuse you from the verse numbers.

That’s a total of 743,267 words.

A professional typist using a standard keyboard averages between 50-80 words a minute. Taking the low end of 50 words a minute  that means it would take you 14,867.34 minutes to type out the whole thing.

As there are 1440 minutes in the day that means it would take you 10.324 days of 24/7 typing to copy an entire bible assuming you were able to maintain that 50 words per minute the entire time without food, drink or rest

Let’s be kind and assume you need to sleep and be generous and give you say 6 hours a night to sleep. Let’s furthermore allow you a full two hours to eat two to three meals, take a bathroom break and dress So instead of working 24/7 you are working a 16 hour day getting up at 5 to type and hitting the sack at 11 PM with two hours during the day for other things. That would make give you about 960 minutes a day to devote to typing the bible finishing in 15.48 days at that steady 50 Word per minute rate throughout without  error (96% correct simply won’t do)

Ok now lets take away your laptop and replace it with a manual typewriter without an auto correct. How much time would the loading of paper add? The correction of errors. The centering etc? Let’s be EXTREMELY generous and say it would only add 10% to your total time so now we’re up to 17 days to copy a Protestant bible working 16 hours a day seven days a week.

Now lose the typewriter and write it by hand. According to Keller in 1988 An average person can copy text by hand at a rate of 22 words per minutes and now you are dealing with getting pens, starting pages over if you make a mistake etc.  Just how long would it take to hand write a bible?  Well a retired fellow by the name of Phillip Patterson managed to do it in 4 years.

Four years after he began his project to write out every word of the Bible, Phillip Patterson penned the very last lines Saturday at an upstate New York church.“Every single curly-q, every single loop, it was all worth it,” said Patterson, 63, moments after inking the final two verses of the King James Bible. “I’m really going to miss this writing.”

It took Patterson just a few minutes to copy the final lines of the Book of Revelation before a crowd of about 125 people at St. Peter’s Presbyterian Church in Spencertown. He ended the ceremony by saying “Amen.”

But lets assume you are not a retired AIDS patient and much healthier than Mr. Patterson, Moreover we are working uninterrupted for our 16 hours a day every day unlike Keller who devoted a mere 14 hours a day on occasion to work on it.

I’ll wager we can cut that four years down to a single year easy.

Now let’s replace our Pen with a fountain pen.  You have to constantly refill your pen and get your bottled ink, but at least it gives your fingers a rest. Plus you’re going to have to worry about ink stains & accidents. How many days would that add to the project?  Less than 10% say a month or more?

Now replace that fountain pen with a quill, now you have to sharpen that quill and be much more careful since it’s easier to make a mistake as there is no normal ink flow. Plus there is a danger of puncturing the paper with the point. Where do you think we are now? 14 months? 15?

Now cut off your electricity. You can now only write during time of full sunlight or by candlelight.

Suddenly you’re limited to an average of 12 hours a day to work, but that’s OK because now you have 4 hours to use to actually live and rest, but that takes a full 25% off your writing time. We are now up to 18 months to copy that bible. And you’re pretty much doing it the way a medieval monk used to do so, except your glasses are likely much better so you aren’t straining as much as you write.

But if we want to do what the monk did there are two things we can’t ignore..

#1. Being a monk you are observing the sabbath. So you are now losing one day in seven that gets you up to 21 months to finish that book.

#2 What about calligraphy? Most bibles were not written in just plain you are now adding flourishes and fancy lettering.  This is the word of God not some dimestore novel we’re talking about.

Bottom line you are talking nearly 2 years of manual labor working 12 hour days six days a week to produce a single bible.

So are you really going to stand there and tell me that there was a vast Catholic conspiracy to keep Bibles away from the general public when it took two full man years of manual labor to produce a single copy?

Given the amount of man hours it’s a wonder that any Bibles were produced at all and it speaks to the dedication and the faith of both the Catholic Church and the monks at the time that there were bibles even for the clergy let alone for anyone else.

And we haven’t even taken into account the lack of literacy among people living at subsistence level or the cost of such a book. (At $2 an hour 12 hours a day 6 days a week no overtime that $7488 in today’s money not counting materials. Tell me how many $7500 items do you have in YOUR house)?

So the next time some fool tries to tell you of the grand Catholic conspiracy of millennia to keep scripture out of the hands of the people give them this post or tell them to put their fingers where their mouths are.

The Palestinians Losing the Culture War in Israel

Posted: July 16, 2014 by datechguy in Israel, middle east
Tags:

We’ve briefly talked about the revenge killing of Muhammad Abu Khdei who was murdered in response to the kidnapping and slaying of three Israeli teens, but what we haven’t talked about is the cultural significance in this.

I think it’s the sign of a cultural turn and one that our Palestinian friends should see as a huge warning sign.

One of the constant lies of Palestinian/arab propaganda is the idea of Jewish “ethnic cleansing” or Apartheid we’ve demolished this myth several times here but we never really talked about why it’s false.

Israel certainly has the power, the ability and the weaponry to wipe the Palestinians off the face of the earth. If the Jewish state choose, it could say half a mile into Gaza, totally destroy the existing housing there, create a kill zone and simply move the border accordingly. The arabs couldn’t stop them and would be subject to massive slaughter if they tried. They are in the position to take and displace the arabs en masse whenever they want. If they wanted to rebuild the temple, the dome of the rock would be gone and no arab army would react because to do so would invite slaughter.

So why doesn’t Israel do these things?

The answer is pretty simple, the western values that Israel has precludes those things but it’s more than that.

Israel was founded in the late 40′s and fought a full-scale war in the 40′s, 50′s 60′s and 70′s and 80′s to keep it. That generation goal was always the security of the Jewish state, simply to be left alone.

But time passes and that generation is dying.

Now Israel has a population where more than half of their people were born after the six-day war. Jerusalem and the west bank have been a part of Israel all their lives. They have not had to fight a full-scale war but have endorsed rocket & terror attacks regularly.

While the older generation might have accepted this as the price of the return to their ancient lands the younger generation is likely to have none of it. They did not flee from arab lands to Israel as their parents or grandparents did and do not have the memory of a time when they might have had friendly, or at least not hostile arab neighbors.

All they know is they are trying to live their lives and the Arabs are tying to kill them while they do so to make up for a war they lost and their failure to destroy them.

Furthermore they see those same arabs celebrating their deaths and they unlike the west, know what the Arabs are saying in arabic and know exactly what the Palestinians are being taught and what their goals really are. The best symbol of this?

Palestinian rioters in the Arab-Israeli town of Shuafat outside Jerusalem have completely destroyed a new light rail system built by Israel to improve travel in the city and connect it to other towns.

And that message has not been lost on those who saw it.

The total destruction of the modern light rail—which was seen as a symbol of coexistence between Israeli and Arab areas of Jerusalem—is evidence of mounting frustration among Israeli Arabs, who have increasingly clashed with Israeli police as tensions reach a boiling point following the murders.

“These are Arab-Israelis in Jerusalem, and they destroyed a multi-million dollar project that connected them to the rest of the city,” said Jonathan Schanzer, vice president of research for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). “This is apartheid, self imposed.”.

That leads to changing attitudes to a new generation of Israeli warriors and not one that bodes well for the Arabs:

Tamir Lion, an anthropologist who studies youth, said he was troubled by the changing attitudes among Israel’s young people. For many years, Mr. Lion interviewed soldiers about why they chose to enter combat units. “The answers,” he said on Israel Radio, “were always about the challenge, to show I could make it, the prestige involved.”

That began to change in 2000, he said. “I started to get answers — not a lot, but some — like: ‘To kill Arabs.’ The first time I heard it, it was at the time of the large terror attacks, and since then it has not stopped.”

A generation has grown up in a period of Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with suicide bombs and military incursions, rocket fire and airstrikes. Young people on both sides may think about the other more as an enemy than as a neighbor.

Mr. Lion, head of research at the Ethos Institute, said he was troubled. “Today I can say, and everyone who works with youth will say it, Jewish youth in Israel hate Arabs without connection to their parents or their own party affiliation and their own political opinions.”

This represents a serious miscalculation for the arabs and their allies:

Those who blamed Israel for radicalizing Palestinian youth could do so freely because they never thought Israeli youth could be radicalized in sufficient numbers to expose their hypocrisy. They might now be wondering if they were wrong.

The 20 something who joined the Israeli army in 2000 is now the 30 something vet and or junior or middle officer in 10 more years they will be the General in charge of striking back and it 20 more years they will be the prime minister who says “enough”. Moreover that population will be augmented by Jews who have fled Islamic persecution in Europe.

While Seth Mandel doesn’t think Israeli youth may be resentful of the Palestinians who have tried to kill them I’m betting they not only resent it, but are getting damn tired of it and in a very few years those youth will be in government and will not be inclined to show restraint.

For decades the Arabs have wanted to exterminate the Jews but have not had the power, during that same time the Jews had the power to exterminate the Arabs but did not have the will or desire.

I predict that in a generation the Arabs will still not have the power to exterminate the jews but the jews will not only still have that power, but might also have the will to do it.

If I were the arabs I’d make a deal and make it NOW while the 1948 generation is still alive because any deal they will get once they’re gone will come from the barrel of a gun.

The Continued Peonage of the Black Voter

Posted: July 11, 2014 by datechguy in Uncategorized

double flat Blackbirds for sale!

Handle them, fondle them
But don’t finger them!
They’re prime! They’re prime!

Ya-ha Ya-ha-ma-cundah! double flat

1776 Song Molasses to Rum to Slaves 1972

Buck O’Neil:   (on Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in baseball):  We were all elated — it was the death knell for our baseball. But… who cares?

One of the stories of my youth that always struck was the story of how my paternal grandparents, born in Italy and not familiar with the law or english,  first received social security.

My parents were visiting their house when my mother discovered in conversation that her retired father in law was not collecting social security.  She asked why.  They told her it was because they didn’t want to give up their land.

Confused by the answer she asked what that had to do with it and they told her they weren’t allowed to collect social security if they had land in their name.

Incredulous my mother told them that wasn’t the case and asked where on earth they got that idea.  They told her everyone knew that. In fact her sister in-laws noted a local paisano had arranged to help other Italian immigrants get around this requirement by letting having fellow Italians sign over their land to her so they would qualify for their checks, then doing the paperwork necessary for them to collect.

Mom wasn’t having that.  She told her father-in-law that he didn’t have to give up his land to anyone to collect and insisted she would fill out  the paperwork herself so he could get his social security.  His daughters ridiculed her for thinking she knew more than a respected leader in the Italian American community at least they did until my grandfather got his first social security check with his property intact.  Not long afterwards my mother did the paperwork for her mother-in-law as well earning the favor of my paternal grandparents (and ironically the scorn of their daughters who would ironically inherit their parent’s land) for the rest of their lives.

This kind of story was not uncommon among immigrants. Coming to a new country, unfamiliar with the law and the language, they often found themselves exploited by their fellow countrymen who used the bonds of race, religion and culture and their fears of the powers that be to cement their own positions and wealth.  They would become leaders using their position as the go betweens with the greater culture to provide positions in civil service (or not so civil services) to those looking for favors in return and thus cement their positions as leaders within the community and their contact with the general culture.  Meanwhile if the political bosses of the greater culture needed bodies, muscle or votes from that community they were the people who you dealt with.

Such power (or scams) depended on a fresh set of immigrants coming in to the community so there would be a steady unending supply of alienated people separated from the rest of society as a whole, because once children & grandchildren were educated and assimilated into the greater culture, the gravy train of the bosses was over.

And that in a round about way brings us to not just Mississippi’s GOP primary but the block voting of the Black community that (currently) keeps Democrats in power.

From the Italians to the Poles to the Chinese and even Blacks from Africa , people have passed though the cities, and had their political power funnelled through bosses & leaders building little Italies, Polands and Chinatowns while their kids became assimilated.  Once they did the little Italies, little Polands and Chinatowns of the cities slowly shrank into insignificance compared to what they once were as the children and grandchildren moved out and up becoming not so much Italian Americans or Polish Americans or Chinese Americans but Americans.

As a rule this didn’t happen to the black community, a very large part of said community remained apart, first due to Jim Crow in the south and to some degree redlining in the north, both extended the lives of the political boss far beyond their normal dying point.

America being America this could not continue forever and eventually laws were passed ending these practices and imposing stiff penalties to those who would violate them.

One would have expected that once that process was complete the America Black community would have integrated and  the era of the bosses would be over.

You would be wrong.

While new African immigrants followed the path of other immigrant groups the black community who had suffered under these laws remained to a large degree separated.  A big part reason for this were the actions of black leadership.

Like the “bosses” of various communities their prosperity depended on keeping their community separate but unlike those bosses they had several advantages that the other bosses did not.

Firstly the members of the community had decades of history with discrimination because of this history they were naturally distrustful that new laws and rules would be enforced.

Secondly because the political machine was linked to black church “bosses” were inevitably church leaders.  It’s no wonder the two biggest race hucksters in the nation are the Reverend Jessie Jackson and the Reverend  Al Sharpton.

Thirdly the leader most likely to have encouraged integration into society as a whole M. L. King’s was murdered.

Fourthly with the cold war it was in the interest of those opposed to American Power to do all possible to encourage said separation.  They had wisely used Jim Crow as a counterweight to mitigate their own abuses and because of this had entre to black leadership once it was over.    (This incidentally is the same reason why Nelson Mandela had no problem lionizing some of the most murderous and oppressive regimes in the world it was to a large degree understandable payback for aid when they needed it.)  It’s no coincidence that Black Democrats were almost uniformly on the side of the Soviets, of the Sandinistas, of Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro.

But the most important factor was gerrymandering and seniority.  Under normal circumstances a party will attempt to draw districts that dilute the voting power of their opponents.  For example in Massachusetts a fair amount of conservatives live in Worcester County however that voting strength is divided among three different congressional districts.

However Black Democrats in congress and Republicans alike realized that by redrawing lines, under the requirements of the voting rights act to create black majorities in district both would benefit.

With the vast majority of the overwhelmingly black vote in a single district suddenly the GOP’s prospects increased geometrically

Meanwhile black democrats ended up with practically primary proof districts guaranteeing their power for as long as they wanted it along with all the patronage that comes with it.  That also meant they could create their own mini-machines with sub bosses able to turn out the vote when the time or the money was right.

And when Thad Cochran came knocking with five figures to spend for two weeks work, the price was right.

Cochran as a white republican was able to buy the black vote in Mississippi because it increased the power and the credibility of the bosses,

Meanwhile a black republican can never count on that support because she is not willing to allow them to wet their beaks.  Her very existence is a threat to their entire power structure in both the political and the academic world that the political machine helped finance.

That is the real crime of black republicans in the eyes of black leaders.  Not their voting records or beliefs but the fact they attempt to gain power outside of their structure and if they succeed the process of integration that  the bosses have managed to delay for generations might actually begin and the black community freed from the leaders who would keep them in peonage.

And to those leaders whose wealth and power depend on that simply can’t allow that to happen.

That, in my opinion,  is the real scandal not just of Mississippi but of the black vote in america and until that changes, no matter how many “minority” representatives are voted into congress, no matter how many Black studies programs grace the universities,  the Black community in the United States will never reach its full potential.

In Godfather 2 there is a telling exchange between a twenty something Vito Corleone when he first sees the actions of Don Fanucci  in the US.

Genco: Fanucci’s with the Black Hand. The whole neighborhood pays him. Even my father, in the grocery store.
Vito Corleone: If he’s Italian…why does he bother other Italians?
Genco: He knows they have nobody to protect them.

When I see what has happened in Chicago, in the inner cities I ask the same question that Vito does, and I must conclude the answer is even worse than Genco, it’s not that they have no protector, it’s that it’s in their “protectors”  interest to remain effectively serfs for the sake of their “protector’s” power.

I think it’s a disgrace.