Fonzie: [after being humiliated by 15 uncontrollable kids] They figured out my weakness the Fonz does not hit little kids. [starts to leave]
Richie: So where are you going?
Fonzie:To find someone who does eyyy!
[After returning with his nephew spike]
Fonzie: …but if Spike hits you that’ s just one little kid hitting another and that’s not against the law.
Happy Days Football Frolics 1976
If you have the stomach for it read this post concerning the Mass Rape of White Girls in England by Pakistani Muslim men for the last 20 year and the left ignoring to preserve their multicultural myth.
Every racially aggravating factor you could imagine is present. First, there is substantial evidence that the young girls in question were targeted because they were white. In these communities of Pakistani Muslim rapists, hardly any of the victims were Pakistani Muslim women.
But if you REALLY want to see what the solution to the problem is, look at this comment in the piece:
It wasn’t just white girls, though it was mostly them, but Sikh and Hindu girls. The fathers of the Sikh and Hindu girls went after their Muslim attackers armed with swords and other weapons, and there were battles in the streets. Some might have been arrested, I can’t remember, but they didn’t face the usual left-wing go-to accusations of being “far right” or “racists.” And the Muslim men did not go after those girls again (emphasis DTG). The Sikhs set up the Sikh Awareness Society to warn their local girls of the potential dangers. No such warnings were ever given to white girls that I know of, bearing in mind they would have been told repeatedly that everyone is the same, and it’s racist to regard other races in any way except favourably. The State groomed them almost as much as those gangs…
Yes you read that right, the same “multicultural” BS that prevented the authorities from protecting White British girls from being protected from these people allowed the Sikh’s to defend and save their daughters without fear of arrest and hinderance.
And because incentives matter Sikh girls were spared and white girls were not because there was an incentive for Pakistani men to avoid targeting them.
Frankly if I was a British father in this situation I would approach the Sikh community as Bonasera did Don Corleone hat in hand to ensure that scum would be suffering that very day.
The nations, not so blest as thee, Must, in their turns, to tyrants fall; While thou shalt flourish great and free, The dread and envy of them all
."Rule, Britannia! rule the waves: "Britons never will be slaves."
Rule Britannia! 1740
I have often argued that the two greatest social developments in the history of mankind for the cause of good are
Christianity
British Common Law
The first Christianity establishes the idea that all people are equal in the sight of God:
Men, women, slaves, freemen, Jews, Greeks, rich, poor (to use the phrases of scripture) all are God children and thus due the respect of such.
Even if you don’t believe in Christ, that idea was about as radical as you can get in the 1st century. And it is from that idea that the rights of man evolved.
The second British common law built on both the concepts of Christianity and the rights granted by Magna Carta. Again this was revolutionary.
From this grew the concept that if men were equal before God they should also be equal before the law. It was the idea that the law applied to the great as well as the common, the powerful as well as the powerless and that judgement would not come in a summary manner.
It was this idea spread by the Brits going around the world that made possible those in the world who would eventually leave the empire they would build, because they would be educated in this law and then insist that said ideas be applied where they were.
Now I don’t claim for a moment that these concepts were always applied by imperfect humans nor to I claim that there were not those who tried to use them for their own advantages. If you want perfection you’ll have to wait for heaven. Suffice to say that those who would use such things for advantage would have had no problem using other systems the same way, systems that didn’t provide legal or social restraint to their goals.
These things changed the world for the better.
That’s what makes Britain’s situation today really sad and completely predictable.
Once the British started rejecting Christianity, equality before God, it became easy to reject equality before the law. The seeds laid by Henry VIII finally bloomed at the 1930 Lambeth Conference and have now spread and taken solid root to the point where Englishmen don’t have confidence in their own culture and are now ironically being colonized by a people who DO have confidence in both their laws and religion which proclaim them superior.
Thus if all men are not equal in the eyes of God why would they be equal before the law so why should British police or members of the British government risk their single life and limb with no reward to follow to enforce the laws of those who might harm them if they do or protect the rights of those who can not?
And of course nobody can be allowed to speak aloud this shameful change, they must all be silent less their true state be known and the newly minted slaves become aware of their chains.
So much for “Britons never never never shall be slaves”
We‘ve reached a situation where swastikas are permitted at an anti-Israel demonstration in London because the British policeman says it’s fine and "depends on the context"! Who would have believed that we’ve regressed by 80 years… pic.twitter.com/AXM22lSLne
— יוסף חדאד – Yoseph Haddad (@YosephHaddad) March 31, 2024
This is an example of actual “islamophobia” that exists is among governments like England and colleges in the US who are terrified that if they stand up to those who support the mass murder of Jews, people that they’ve lionized and protected as “oppressed” they would face violence themselves from those very same people.
It’s is that fear that illustrates they know the actual reality and are too cowed to deal with it.
As a person who enjoys the study of history it’s rather fascinating to watch a society decaying and falling due to suicide which is the cause of the fall of every republic in history.
It’s in fact a lot less interesting when you are watching it happen while living within it.
Unless you live under a rock you will know that Queen Elizabeth II died yesterday at the age of 96 as the longest reigning monarch in English History. Here are some thoughts:
My first thought is that it’s kind of weird. I’m nearly 60 and for my entire life Elizabeth has been Queen of England. It will be very odd to think of someone else as the monarch of England. Particularly Charles
My second thought was with the death of Elizabeth II the most famous living World War 2 vet is now…Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI who as Joseph Ratzinger was conscripted into German anti-aircraft corps.
I suppose that might be considered a tiny bit of irony that Benedict outlived her although in fairness he is a year younger. It’s also odd to note that two most famous long lived vets of WW II were both leaders of a Christian Church (Church of England, Roman Catholic).
There are a few bricks being thrown at Elizabeth for being a monarch, for the various grievance people had with the British Empire, one might even gripe about her unwillingness at the head of the Anglican Church to stand up for the faith rather than let it collapse.
But in the end all those complaining about what she did or didn’t do have exactly 0 days experience at being a British Monarch, so I think I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt that she was a better expert on how to do it wisely than any of her critics might be.
Besides this isn’t the time to be throwing rocks even if you think she deserved it.
It will be something to see the pomp and ceremony of the coronation of Charles as King of England. Given the degree of unbelief in the nation, the no longer primarily English nationality of the population, and the general rejection of all the norms of society it will be almost comical to see the Brits try to pretend that all is as it was.
And given the turmoil within the family generated by the new king’s daughter in law her presence at the events from the funeral to the coronation is going to be very…interesting.
Finally I have a nasty feeling that this tweet which was slightly premature is accurate:
I suspect what's left of the England that was worth fighting for has died with her
Da Techguy's (no longer backup) Blog 