I have maintained in the past that although you have to do what you have to do in the war on terror it is important to question what is being done to keep yourself honest.
I have questioned the left’s insistence that Gitmo has needed to be closed and the left has misrepresented the place over and over.
I also maintain Waterboarding is not torture, but I can see why some have said so.
The use of prisons in other western countries is a little more iffy since we may not have control but the various western countries have rules to keep things in check.
Now of all the tactics used Rendition is the most iffy, its the one that leaves me the most queasy. Of the left’s arguments this one was the best of the batch. And Obama has decided to keep it and expand it:
Barack Obama exploited that outrage when he promised Hope and ChangeTM, and the Left squealed with joy over the Brave New Obama World in national security. Now they’ll have to squeal again as Obama has had a sudden revelation as President that renditions are more necessary than ever, if the CIA can’t hold these subjects at Gitmo or its own secret sites:
Moe Lane called out leftist bloggers on this but the most amazing thing is reported at Dissenting justice where he calls out Human Rights Watch:
Now that the L.A. Times reports that rendition will continue during the Obama administration, Human Rights Watch has apparently altered its position. According to Tom Malinowski, the organization’s “Washington advocacy director,” the risk of torture and other abuses does not mandate the prophylactic cessation of rendition. Instead (quoting the L.A. Times)
I haven’t seen such a double standard by a “human rights group” since…well every time any of em deal with Israel.
I give full marks to that blog on the left for doing so and being honest enough to be outraged. I actually liked the outrage on the left over Gitmo because although false it produced an irrational fear of the place to the newly captured that might have gotten them talking but now the choices have been reduced to bad ones.
Don’t you wonder what Obama saw in the briefings that changed his mind on this? I’ll give the last word to the Captain:
Frankly, I think the US does a better job of treating its detainees than anywhere a rendition program would deliver them, but without a Gitmo or CIA holding site, that’s the only way to ensure that we can get any intelligence that will protect the US. I’m not surprised that Obama has reached the same conclusion, now that he has the responsibility to keep the nation secure from foreign attack. It’s amazing how clarifying that responsibility can be, and Obama at least must have a little more comprehension of what Bush went through the last seven years.
Bingo!
Update: Whoa! My first Instalance and I didn’t even notice it. Hi. Take a look around, particularly if you are looking for remote tech support. or if you are a Fan of Morning Joe which I tend to liveblog a bit. See the shock of Iranian rejection and learn the ways of the internet scam. I write a bit about Religion, Israel, my current job search and a tad bit of baseball.
Oh and if you are a Doctor Who fan make sure you check out this blog. It isn’t mine but its awesome.
Update 2: Missed the link to Captain Ed at hotair, thanks to commenter Paul for catching it.
Update 3: I guess he gets an Arthur vote for this. Running total Jimmy Carter 6 Chester Arthur 3. An explanation of the Arthur Carter watch here.
Update 4: A disagreement in comments continues here.
Da Techguy's (no longer backup) Blog 