Archive for February, 2011

11:55 a.m. On voting for the person not the party

11:45 a.m. A video of a question on Unions:

11:39 a.m. During Q & A about running for low offices and going to high offices: “Invest in the office you are in so that the people will want to promote you to higher office.”

11:20 a.m. Next speaker: “Starting now if you are thinking of being elected you need to do one thing every day. Many times simply listening is enough let people know you are interested in what they say.” “That which unites us is greater than that which divides us.”

11:17 a.m Healey mentions he is a Yankee fan, that got a few moans (:c)

11:15 a.m. Chris Healey Conn GOP chairman on the economy: “We all know what the situation is. We all know people out of work.” “Do not let one democratic lie go unanswered.”

The running for office panel

11:10 a.m. The speakers make it a point that you have to get to know the people and knock on door after door, sounds like selling radio time.

The Crowd at the Running for office breakout session

11:00 a.m. Inside the running for office breakout session a great crowd in here.

The Twin City Tea Party folks with Mary Z

10:55 a.m. Lots of Fitchburg Gardner Leominster folks here

Mary Z and Frank in the hallway

10:50 a.m. Ran into Tom Wesley whose Radio show will be premiering tonight

Pulled in around 10:45 a.m. the parking lot is full.

Today we are doing the show live at the GOP Growing Grassroots 2011 conference in Milford Mass. I will be driving down this morning and updating during the day as time permits.


DaTechGuy on DaRadio features nationally known political blogger Peter Ingemi (DaTechGuy) as host. Mr. Ingemi has covered Political campaigns and events down the east coast and best known for his political blog Datechguy at https://datechguy.wordpress.com (over 60,000 page views in Jan 2011 alone)

The radio show DaTechGuy on DaRadio brings a combination of nationally known bloggers (such as Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit & Dan Riehl of Big Government) and local NE Bloggers (Roxeanne DeLuca and Bob Belvedere) to talk about the issues. The second hour features a panel discussion of the week’s issues including both national & local figures along with authors and representatives of various groups.

It draws its audience from groups including Conservative and Tea party Activists, Bloggers and their readers, along with those who follow politics and talk radio. Additionally the show draws from the WCRN’s morning political lineup beginning at 6 a.m. building on their audience through the day.

For advertisers local and national the advantages are clear:

  • An established local/national blogger with a large following (268k+ hits in 2010)
  • An assortment of local and national bloggers bringing their audience with them.
  • A show that in just three months has doubled in size and moved from evening to morning
  • 50,000 Watts of range covering New England.
  • A series of morning talk with each show building on the next
  • National players talking politics with interest high just in time for the 2012 NH primary season!

All of this means a customer base worth your investment.

Ad Rates Starting 2/5/2011
 

Time may be broken down in any combination equaling purchased time

Daytime Coverage Map for WCRN

Price per time segment Min:sec

Total Time Purchased Per Show

Purchased for 1 Week

Purchased for 6 Weeks

Purchased for 13 Weeks (20% down balance due by Wk 9)

:15

$25

$135

$270

:30

$45

$250

$500

1:00

$75

$400

$800

2:00

$140

$750

$1,500

4:00 (sponsor)

$250

$1350

$2700

Note:  Any 4 min purchase makes you the “show sponsor” for an available hour and you will be announced as such during the show.

If you would like to join our family of advertisers or have any questions email us at datechguy@comcast.net or leave a comment on this post. For information regarding WCRN proper please contact Chris Thompson at WCRN at If you have further questions concerning WCRN contact Chris Thompson our general sales manager at 508-792-5803 or e-mail chris@wcrnradio.com

Rubin Reports continues to note what is going on with the Muslim Brotherhood and peace:

On Russian television, one Brotherhood leader, Rashad al-Bayoumi, said that when they came to power they will abolish the treaty altogether.

Another, former spokesman Doctor Kamel Helbaoui, explains one way they might get out of it. It is also a good example of how they avoid embarassing questions, and usually get away with it. Clearly, Brotherhood leaders have been warned to avoid extremist statements as it tries to sell itself to the Western audience and (insert adjective) media as moderate and cuddly.

One of the amazing things about the left is how they treat the right as not being “cosmopolitanism” yet we are noticing stuff from Russian and French TV and they are not. We are also noting what the Brotherhood says in Arabic:

You have to understand the bizarre situation here. Every speech in Arabic of Brotherhood leaders and cadre and articles in their publications are full of anti-Jewish hatred, anti-American hatred, and support for violence. Yet in the Western media all of this simply is never mentioned, in part because reporters take the group’s word on its credentials.

In other words, the Brotherhood will end the peace with Israel and return to a state of war.

And of course “violence” is defined in a different way:

Morsy also said the Muslim Brotherhood opposed violence. “We do not use violence against anyone,” he said. But what was happening on “Palestinian land,” however, he said, was not violence but “resistance. And resistance is acceptable by all mankind. And it is the right of people to resist imperialism,” he said.

So violence against Jews is not “violence” so that doesn’t count.

Israel Matzav thinks the media is engaged in wishful thinking, I disagree. I think given the coverage of the middle east that we have seen I’m becoming increasingly of the opinion that the media considers war and terror against Israel as “just deserts”.

And I think both the Muslim Brotherhood and the left understands that an administration that will sell out its oldest ally will not bother to defend Israel. In fact they are counting on it.

The Egyptian people have the right to a government of their choosing, they have the right to decide their future, and they have the responsibility to live with and suffer the consequences of decisions of a free government, freely made. If they choose a government that decides it doesn’t want peace, then the responsibility and the consequences of war are on them. If they choose to peacefully co-exist then they should reap the benefits of it as well.

It’s up to them.

Update: Lets remember the words of their supporters on the left in America and exactly what these guys are.

via Sissy Willis:

There’s a whole army of patriotic Davids out there across this great country ready to stand up and to speak out in defense of liberty, and these Davids aren’t afraid to tell Goliath “don’t tread on me.”

That’s just one line (Sissy has more here) but consider.

That is the second time in under a month in a major presentation that she quoted Glenn Reynolds (the other was the blood libel line from his WSJ piece).

Can we assume that Sarah Palin reads Glenn Reynolds? (Some enterprising radio host should have him on his show.)

Glenn Reynolds draws between 250,000 and 500,000 hits a day and gets 30-60 posts up per day EVERY DAY. If Sarah Palin is quoting him them perhaps a wise reporter would get to know him, or a smart producer would have him on the air.

Then again I don’t expect much from the MSM, supposedly the NYT was there and couldn’t even get her meeting people after the speech right

Prospective candidates, particularly if they are courting supporters, routinely sit through dinners and mingle with guests. But in her case, Ms. Palin entered the room only for her speech and left immediately after.

Actually Palin stayed and took photos with attendees as was announced at the start of the speech. If they can’t get that detail right when they were supposedly there why would I expect them to follow-up on this kind of story.

You know there is a reason why Instapundit took down the “NYT of bloggers” comment from his site. The times should work for the day when they can be called the “instapundit of newspapers”.

Update: Conservatives for Palin notices