The Redsox have since the Chiam Bloom Era have hoarded prospects the way Scrooge hoarded cash. This week they spent four of them including two very high ranking ones for a legit ace Garrett Crochet. The White Sox need everything and the Redsox got exactly what they needed the most.

This automatically makes the rest of the rotation better as they move down a slot and is a strong signal that will all the young talent that broke through last year they are ready to roll. It’s going to be a great three years for Boston fans. The front office was wise to ignore the press and wait till now to strike.

It will be fun


I do not understand all the calls for the head of 1st year coach Jerad Mayo over the Patriots 3-10 start. Does anyone really think a different coach with this team was going to do better?

Their biggest problem is that with so many bad teams (8 teams are 3-10 or worse coming into this week) the best they will manage is a top 10 rather than a top 5 draft pick.

If they can draft a solid lineman or two and pick up a #2 or better wide receiver either via the draft or as they have a ton of cap space through free agency this team will be a playoff team in less than a season.

If he can’t get it done with those additions, THEN we can talk about the coaching

It will be fun


If you’re a Celtics fan if this isn’t the 2nd Bird/McHale/Parish golden age it’s pretty damn close.

While they don’t have the best record in the NBA the C’s are a devastating team with at least 2 to 3 players coming off the bench who would be starting on any other team and starters who despite last year’s championship still have a Tom Brady class chip on their shoulder.

I strongly suggest the Bucks enjoy their NBA cup final as barring massive injuries that’s the closest their team will get to the final this year.

To be sure Cleveland will be no pushover in the east and Dallas, Houston, Memphis and OKC are going to be tough but in a seven game series depth and experience will be hard to match.

It will be fun


Alone among the Boston sports teams the future doesn’t seem bright for the Bruins.

Despite yesterday’s win they are still 1-2 on their latest road trip and seem to have settled down as an average team that if lucky might win a playoff series and frankly there is no reason to believe that the ceiling will get any higher over the next few years.

Their off season signings just don’t seem to have panned out and frankly I see no sign that it will get better.


Finally we are deep into my 1973 league draft and it’s getting interesting. My own team looks pretty good but I see myself with a B+ ace instead of an A+ Ace but I’ve also added Billy Williams to support Pete Rose and Darryl Porter is now of age to make a different.

I mention Pete Rose because I’ve been watching the HBO special on him made just before he died and there is one conclusion I’ve come to.

There is a legit debate on the HOF, Rose’s numbers clearly warrant it & his gambling on Baseball as a manager clearly warrants his banning and there is was also the mercy after 30 years argument.

But it also appears to me at a time when interest in baseball is down Rose’s situation made sure he was news for thirty years and made him the single most discussed great player in the game. More people know just how incredible a player Rose was BECAUSE of his banning and the scandals are the reason why 30+ years after the fact HBO is did a special, not on Bench, not on Joe Morgan, Not on Reggie Jackson or the Beloved Brooks Robinson, or Big Papi or A-Rod or Clemens and Bonds, but on Pete Rose.

While it must have torn his guts out to be left out of the HOF the one thing all of this has established is that while you might not like him, or what he did or trust him at his word, the one thing firmly established in any person’s mind is that if you wanted to build a team to win, Pete Rose is the guy you start with, Period!

That’s a hell of a legacy!

…who said this about executing deserters in a letter to Ernastus Corning:

“Must I shoot a simple-minded soldier boy who deserts, while I must not touch a hair of a wiley agitator who induces him to desert? This is none the less injurious when effected by getting a father, or brother, or friend, into a public meeting, and there working upon his feeling, till he is persuaded to write the soldier boy, that he is fighting in a bad cause, for a wicked administration of a contemptable government, too weak to arrest and punish him if he shall desert. I think that in such a case, to silence the agitator, and save the boy, is not only constitutional, but, withal, a great mercy.”

If Luigi Mangione died tomorrow I would not want to be him facing St. Peter, but if the choice was between being him before St. Peter tomorrow and being the professors at his college who radicalized him on the day of judgement I’d take my chances as Luigi.

Update: I should point out that both Mangione and the professors in question are like all others, one sincere confession away from avoiding the fire.

Jesus answered him, “Friend, do what you have come for.” Then stepping forward they laid hands on Jesus and arrested him. And behold, one of those who accompanied Jesus put his hand to his sword, drew it, and struck the high priest’s servant, cutting off his ear. Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its sheath, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword.

Matthew 26:50-52

About 35 years ago or so I was approached by a young lady I knew who wanted some advice. She was approached by a fellow I knew and was interested but wanted my opinion on jumping in so to speak.

Now there was a time when the obvious answer: “He’s married!” would have ended the conversation before it began but as this fact had not dissuaded her I decided arguing on moral grounds would fail so instead I made a point concerning self interest noting that if he was willing to abandon a wife and kids to score with you how much faster would he drop you for the next willing woman without those incentives to stay faithful.

And that brings us to the question at hand.

Not too long ago it would have been a given that gunning down a person in cold blood is wrong and that would be the end of the conversation but apparently for the modern college student who is being indoctrinated by leftist Marxist professors who have abandoned the idea that life is sacred such an argument isn’t going to work so let me make one based on simple self interest to those who are cheering over this murder:

1st of all if you are a college student doing this you can kiss goodbye any prospect of getting hired by any significant company for any responsible position but given that many of the folks leading the cheers are already from families with dough that might not be enough of an incentive so let’s get down to the nitty gritty.

If you’re argument is that the “harm” or “potential” harm that a CEO is doing to you or others in a justification for murder then by that same argument a CEO can look at every single person endorsing such murder, every college professor defending such murder and honestly conclude that such people present a clear and present danger to their lives and the lives of their families and thus have a legitimate justification to kill any such person based on self defense.

Furthermore given that a CEO is likely to have a pretty fair sized checkbook it would not take a lot of effort for such a person to obtain a person willing and able to carry out such an assignment who could act discretely without implicating his employer and unlike a CEO who can afford protection it’s very likely that many of these fools cheering this murder on has no such protection and thus could not only be eliminated but could be taken care of in such a way to make that vulnerability clear to all those others cheering over blood.

Now all of this would be so much easier if we returned to the idea that humans are made in the image of God and murdering people who are not an immediate threat to you and yours is an evil thing to do, but since a segment of the population has abandoned this idea let just point out that it’s rather rash to provide an incentive to a person with power and money to kill you or to encourage a group of people with power, money and connection to do so, but hey that’s just me, what do I know compared to college kids being egged on by his professors on this kids of stuff, but hey that’s just me.

Just like most Conservatives and Libertarians who post regularly on social media, I have been bullied and harassed by my progressive friends constantly.  These tedious verbal assaults prove that the political left is a vast top-down echo chamber where reality is frowned upon. For this article I have complied a list of the most common or most absurd comments that my progressive friends have tortured me with over the years.

Just because I was celebrating the fact that Planned Parenthood funding will most likely be on the Department of Government Efficiency chopping block a liberal friend decided to chronicle every single gynecological issue her and her family ever had. She claimed falsely that poor women all across this country would die if Planned Parenthood did not receive funding because that is the only place they get care.  She also repeated the lie over and over again that women in red states are dying because gynecological care was banned by pro-life laws. 

My liberal friends get incensed every time I post the fundamental truth that abortion is murder.  I get bombarded with absurd comments claiming that unborn children are not alive. I often get called a science denier.  Oh the irony. 

One liberal friend informed me that only certain religious sects maintain that unborn children are a vessel for life.  That same friend told me repeatedly that that religion must be kept out of politics.   I found that statement to be rather absurd on several levels. 

Our entire legal system was based on Judean Christian principles.  If you divorce religious morality from government, you get atrocities such as the holocaust and all of the mass slaughters that occurred under communism.

The separation of church and state is a myth.  The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment only prevents the United States from declaring an official State Religion.  It does not prevent individuals from governing according to religious beliefs.  That is actually protected by the Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the First Amendment.