Posts Tagged ‘culture wars’

One of the great truisms of life is that people tend to believe that the world begin with their birth.

This is of course quite normal in the sense that our experience of the outside world begins in that moment. This is of course why having two good parents makes all the difference because those early experiences are going to shape you heavily.

It’s also the reason why the left is so anxious and so intent on getting to the school kids from the sexual grooming to the rewriting and abolishing of history because without knowledge of history people do not understand how the world works.

To illustrate this let me turn back to Stacy McCain’s piece that I referenced yesterday. Let’s hear about his ambition as a young man:

When I was a young man, I was full of wild and reckless ambition. My dream was to become a multimillionaire rock star, to record a string of platinum-selling albums, tour the world, marry Brooke Shields and retire by age 30 to enjoy my wealth in a mansion on my own private island.

Readers may laugh at this, but I was very serious about it — driving a forklift in an industrial warehouse, saving up to buy a P.A. system for my band — and my idea was, “Why bother with small dreams?”

The advantage of small dreams is they are easier to achieve. My dreams were much smaller, degree, wife, family and my own business and by age 28 I met them. While the business eventually failed and reverses took me out of the job that of my degree both Stacy & I ended up very much in the same place:

Things didn’t work out the way I’d planned, of course, and becoming a mere journalist would have once seemed to me a great disappointment, but certainly I’ve succeeded in many ways that others might envy. My lovely wife and I have raised six children and now have five grandchildren, and in my maturity, I’ve come to appreciate the value of something I once viewed with disdain, i.e., middle-class respectability.

If you asked me what I want for my children and grandchildren, that’s it in a nutshell.

This is where a knowledge of history becomes huge. How could someone like Stacy, who has been all over the country, rubbed elbows with people of wealth and consequence, someone who has seen so much have such a small ambitions for his children and grandchildren?

The answer is simple, because he understands that for almost the entire history of humanity that middle class respectability was a pipe dream. That’s 97% chance to avoid poverty was a wild dream that people strived for.

Consider. For most of human history life was about:

  • Finding food for the day
  • Finding shelter for the night
  • Finding safety from attack

And you’ll note that this list doesn’t even touch on avoiding disease or preserving food because those things are luxuries when you don’t have those first three things covered.

For most of human history this was what it was all about. It took generations upon generations to get to the point where a solid chunk of the population had these things.

Even when the basics of farming were developed it was a question of storing food in a way that meant you would have something to eat the next day, if another person or an animal didn’t take it first that is.

Consider for a moment why so many people came to America after it’s founding and in the 19th century. They came because they believed that by hard work they would be able to achieve those basic goals. Such people were even willing to waive the 3rd goal for a time, heading west figuring that if they worked hard enough they would eventually have a safe place for themselves and their children.

And remember these were the days before electricity. Survival required toil, unrelenting toil, the type the the young people of today objecting to the idea of having to work for a living couldn’t imagine and likely wouldn’t survive.

And even if you managed to reach a point where your food supply and shelter both from the elements and from attack were secure, you weren’t affluent, you were breaking even.

John McCormick the former speaker of the house knew this when in 1968 the Reverend Ralph Abernathy & a group of fifty marchers from the “poor people’s march on Washington” who he had invited to his office were talking down to him and he answered:

You’re talking down at me, Let me tell you, I was poor when poor was POOR.

Tip O’Neill Man of the House 1987 page 123

McCormick knew not only his own history but the history of the Irish people and understood the difference between being poor in a country that provided assistance and a safety net to those in need and those who did not. Furthermore he understood the great efforts it had taken to get the country into a position where it could provide the assistance it did.

Alas in a way the country is a victim of its own success. One of the reasons why so many people who are the children, grandchildren and great grand children of the World War 2 generation sneer at the idea of having to earn their way is that the world war 2 generation and those who came before it were so successful in creating a rich and safe country where the sky was the limit that they assume all of this is the norm.

The efforts my grandparents had to make when they came to this country in 1906 were drilled into me along the sacrifices involved in getting through the great depression and the 2nd world war and are a large part of my world view. Likewise Stacy McCain by understanding the poverty of his ancestors like from Winston Wood Bolt captured on the first day of the Battle of Gettysburg, and those who came before is able to appreciate what he has today:

 Our father’s mother, Ma McCain, was more stoic in temperament, as she still resided on the family farm near the Little Tallapoosa River, where she drew her water from the well, cooked on a wood-burning stove and didn’t have indoor plumbing until about 1969. To use the bathroom at Ma McCain’s you went out behind the barn.

Having some sense of the hardship of my pioneer ancestors’ life on the frontier — Ma McCain hoed her vegetable garden well into her 80s — conveyed to me the idea that I was the descendant of survivors. Whatever difficulties and challenges I’ve faced in life are as nothing compared to what my ancestors lived through 150 or 200 years ago. Considering that my own father came within an inch of death in World War II, I think of my existence as somewhat miraculous, and therefore I should be grateful to God even to be alive. How many young Americans today grow up with this sense of themselves as a descendant of heroic survivors?

Stacy can trace his ancestry much further back than I can but in the end our ancestors, my Sicilian Catholics and his English & Scottish protestants had something in common.

While both were by any measurable standard of today would have been considered poor, they did not consider themselves poor but where instead grateful for the chance to be in a country where they could live their lives with those basic things needed in relative security and have a chance to improve their lot and the lot of their children so perhaps their lives could be just a bit easier.

This is why it is so vital for the left do destroy and erase the history of western civilization in general and America in particular and destroy the young’s connection with their ancestors.. A people who understand that their comforts that are their norm rest on the foundation of a culture build by their forebears who suffered hardships so their descendants would not have to is not likely to dismiss either said ancestors or the culture that they built.

Thus they have no appreciation for when poor was poor and because of this they are at a much better chance to find out firsthand.

I was looking at Stacy McCain’s site and he quoted a stat from Douglas Murray that I recall Rick Santorum advancing during his quest for the 2012 GOP nomination which unfortunately he lost to Mitt Romney who lost to Barack Obama whose 2nd term is the primary source of a lot of the ills we are facing today.

The stat is as follows:

However, one of the key insights Murray found from studying poverty statistics was that any young American had a 97% chance of avoiding long-term poverty if they accomplished just four simple things:

1. Get at least a high school diploma.
2. Get a job and keep working.
3. Get married and stay married.
4. Don’t have children before you’re married.

Is this too much to expect? Is this an impossible obstacle to overcome?

For dozens of generations these basis steps (with the exception of the high school diploma which only became common in the late 19th century) were considered so natural and so normal that they didn’t even have to be said. Then again during that same time nobody needed to be a biologist to define “woman” or “marriage” either.

The sad thing is the days when these facts were known by all are in fact still in living memory but my generation of baby boomers, unable to cope with the safe and secure world that their parents had given their blood sweat and tears to bequeath them ran away from these values and thus now their children and grandchildren are at a point where you have them idolizing a terrorist whose primary ambition was to kill them.

But the idolization of Bin Laden and even the Hamas Terrorists have a more basic source, the forgetting of just how lucky they are to be in the position they are in. All of this is achieved in erasing history and forgetting the collective acquired wisdom of millennia that were the building blocks on which their lives were made.

For the last four years I’ve been reliably told by the left that anyone who insisted that or Tweeted out “All Lives Matter” was a racist, a bigot and a person who hated blacks.

Now while that’s of course nonsense since all men are created in the image of God and thus their lives matter, my opinion on this subject was ignored and the “new rules” were put in place by people of the left like the folks at Vox:

Offensive political dog whistles: you know them when you hear them. Or do you?

Or USA Today:

#AllLivesMatter hashtag is racist, critics say

Or Distractify:

Maybe You Mean Well, but This Is Why You Shouldn’t Say “All Lives Matter”

Or even the Washington Post

The racist roots of the dog whistle

In fact do a search for the phrase: “All lives matter is a racist dog whistle” and you will find pages of results of our friends on the left declaring that under their rules (not mine) the phrase “all lives matter” is a racist dog whistle and a reliable sign that the person who utters it is beyond the pale.

Well lo and behold apparently now that Israel is about to invade Gaza to destroy the babykillers of Hamas guess what phrase is acceptable again:

Why I’m shocked SHOCKED that Congresswoman Talib would DARE to suggest that “all lives matter” after all the best and the brightest of the elites have told us for almost half a decade now that any person who dares utter this phrase must be a horrible racist who should be shunned and disreguarded.

Now of course I don’t believe that myself but these aren’t my rules, these are the rules that the left in media, academia and Politics have insisted on so how can it be that Talib can say this without being denounced.

Why anyone might suspect that they don’t actually believe in these new rules that they’ve prorogated and only apply them when there is a political advantage and toss them aside as soon as any ally, like say Mass murderers who slaughter helpless women and children and behead babies allies, might be held responsible for their actions.

I look forward to reading the numerous columns in the left media denouncing Congresswoman Talib as a racist.

I’m sure they’ll be ready to print the day after Iran declares that Israel has a right to exist and defend itself from terrorist attacks.

Unexpectedly of course.

Update: Instalanche: Thanks Glenn, Welcome all take a look around check out how Hamas compares unfavorably to the actual Nazi’s and how parts of the shocked left is a great example of how Hell works.

Also we’re coming up to our 15th anniversary of our blog and frankly things are getting very thin around here. If you like what you see and would like to help us continue beyond our 15th year with our magnificent seven writers through the election year please consider hitting DaTipJar and/or consider subscribing.

And if you’re not in a position to do so prayers are gratefully accepted.

Screwtape: If such a feeling is allowed to live, but not allowed to become irresistible and flower into real repentance, it has one invaluable tendency. It increases the patient’s reluctance to think about the Enemy. All humans at nearly all times have some such reluctance; but when thinking of Him involves facing and intensifying a whole vague cloud of half-conscious guilt, this reluctance is increased tenfold.

C.S. Lewis: The Screwtape Letters #12

Today I’ve been re-importing my hundreds of Big Finish Doctor Who CD’s that I’ve gathered over the last 15 years and in between I’ve been taking a peek at the news and noticed this excellent tweet from Britt Hume vis Twitchy concerning General Miley’s insistence that Joe Biden is “Alert” and “Sound”

Let’s for the sake of this piece stipulate that the General is using the same definition of “alert” and “sound” that Mr. Hume is (which given the Democrat/Media/Deepstate left’s redefining words for their purposes might be a leap) and let’s further stipulate that a leftist who sees this tweet also uses the same definition of said words that Hume is.

With those stipulations one might think that the answer to Mr. Hume’s question is rather obvious.

It is not.

That would seem an odd or even impossible thing to say. Given the evidence at hand it would seem impossible for any reasonable person to believe the general’s words, but you must understand that even if we did not live in an age where objective fact is under attack there is a choice to be made here for any leftist who seriously considered Mr. Hume’s question.

If he believes his eyes then such a leftist must acknowledge several things.

  1. That Joe Biden is not fit for office due to his mental state likely caused by age
  2. That the media/establishment left has been lying to him about said state for years.
  3. Conservatives who have been saying this for a while were telling the truth.

It is those last two things that are the real struggle here, because to acknowledge this opens up a Pandora’s box of questions about things that the left has believed without question and disbelieved without question. They would have to acknowledge their complicity in not only believing the lies but in advancing and promoting them socially.

In short they would have to see themselves in the light of truth and that light might not be a flattering one.

But consider the alternative:

If they choose to ignore the evidence and believe the General vs their eyes then none of those beliefs need be questioned. They can remain in their bubble and enjoy the social affirmation that said bubble offers and insures, free from guilt, free from responsibility, free from the need to look in the mirror and see themselves as they are. To quote Screwtape: “His aim will be to let sleeping worms lie.”

To many that might seem incredible and impossible but remember just this week the girlfriend of Ryan Carlson who saw him murdered right in front of her refused to give the police a description of the murderer for “social justice” reasons.

In short apparently the answer to Brit’s question for the left is in fact obvious not because the answer reveals an obvious truth, but because it supports a convenient lie being told to themselves. Unexpectedly of course.

Rather sad actually

,