Posts Tagged ‘q & a’

A: and no it’s not because they are preparing the ground for 2010, it is because Hoffman is the PALIN candidate.

Once Palin endorsed Hoffman the race changed, it changed what republicans did and what democrats did. Once the election turned out poorly for us Suddenly it was THE race of the night as far as the left was concerned.

As long as Hoffman is connected to Palin they will attack him as “Far Right“. So much easier to go against a 3rd party candidate on the Canadian border than it is to risk angering hundreds of thousands of readers who may or may not be buying your paper. Particularly if you are a republican.

A: The ultimate example of the Gore effect.

Could there have been a worse week for him to be out there?

A: I’m thinking I’m thinking.

A: A statement that Sarah Palin is wrong and they are right.

Apparently the “defense” of his campaign aides that the media is reporting on with baited breath doesn’t include the words. “Sarah Palin is not telling the truth and Nicole Wallace and or Steve Schmidt is.” What is he actually saying?

There’s been a lot of dust flying around in the last few days and I just wanted to mention that I have the highest regard for Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace and the rest of the team … and I appreciated all the hard work and everything they did to help the campaign

I can’t see “I like Sarah Palin but she is lying or wrong or mistaken.” anywhere in that or the rest of what he has said.

I wonder why not?