As anyone who follows me on twitter knows I’m very much into the Dynasty Baseball game, which came out of the old pursue the pennant boardgame from the pre-pc era. It’s my primary pastime these days beside watching regular baseball.

You can have a lot of fun playing in a league but if you want to run your own remember while it’s a lot of fun it’s also quite a bit of work. If you’ve thought of running your own league here are a few things you should consider:

A: Consider how much time you have:

The first thing you need to consider if you want to run a Dynasty league is how much free time you have to both run the league and play in it. Playing a game itself is not all time consuming, about 30-40 minutes per game is what’s required, but if you are scheduling games 2 days, 3 days or even four days a week can add up, particularly if you are not retired or have a family that likes to do things. Furthermore if you’re running a league you have to leave yourself enough time to put out the various fires that take place. So when deciding to run a league make sure you decide:

  1. How much time you have for administration
  2. How much time you have to actually play

What I’d do is figure how many free days I have to play and then subtract one or even two and then set whatever league you create to that length, that will assure that you have time to get it done.

B: Consider what type of league you want

There are three basic types of leagues in order of complexity

  1. Draft leagues (Hardest)
  2. Existing team leagues
  3. Season Replay leagues

All have advantages and disadvantages:

Draft leagues:

Draft leagues involve drafting players from a pool of players from the same season. Draft leagues have several advantages over existing team leagues:

  • A: You get to be GM as well as manager building your own team and are thus more invested in it
  • B You can continue the league year to year to keep up interest
  • C You can tweak the system to add realism, (trades, waiver wires etc)
  • D The Draft itself becomes an event

It’s my experience that some people enjoy the GM factor more than the games itself and that you really become invested in the teams and players. I’ve reached the point in my league that I started in 1969 that I even make baseball cards for the folks on my team to wit:

My Version of Jack Hiatt’s 1971 card

However draft leagues have their downsides:

  • A: Considerably more time to manage
  • B: Handling the rosters
  • C The draft itself may take days or weeks
  • D Keeping Competitive balance
  • E More things to go wrong

Running a draft league means, handling rosters of every single team, running a draft and trying to do it fairly and if you are having a league that goes from season to season keeping up the competitive balance from season to season. All of these require extra work and time depending on the size of your league: (My current draft leagues are 16 players for 1996 and 20 for 1971) and of course the more players the more work.

Bottom line: Draft leagues are in my opinion the most fun but if I were new I’d start with an existing league first to get my feet wet:

Existing team leagues

Having a league of existing teams takes a lot of work out of the system. The adantages are clear:

  1. There is almost no managing of rosters
  2. No trying to get people together for a draft
  3. No worrying about a change from one season to the next
  4. If more than one person wants the Yanks, or Cubs they can have them
  5. You can mix eras
  6. As soon as you have your schedule made you can start at once

Most existing team league involve GREAT teams which is the pool for tournaments. These tend to be very popular because the teams are memorable although you can spice things up as I did by creating leagues that aren’t just great teams two examples:

All pathetic team leagues: Teams in such a league all have to have a minimum loss level (90, 100 or something in between) This makes for a very odd game where you are constantly hoping for players to roll of their opponent’s cards. Also it gets interesting when one such team has a superstar. A 1967 Mets team with Tom Seaver for example. Can you picture the number Seaver produces when only facing slubs?

All Mediocre teams (the SD Jones league) I ran a league of teams that all had records from 80-82 to 82-80. This makes for an interesting league as there is enough of a mix of slubs and stars to really involve managing games.

Either way with these teams you don’t have the same roster / upkeep issues although with some of the older teams you are more likely to run into situations where a team has no pitcher eligible to use.

The disadvantages of set teams are:

  1. Teams are static no variation.
  2. No GM or Draft or Trade type fun
  3. Balance (think 27 yanks vs well almost anyone)
  4. Less incentives for teams losing to continue
  5. The mix of eras can cause anomalies

Bottom line set teams are a good option to start out but tend to be one or two shot deals. They work with teams that

Replay Leagues

With a replay league you play a team in an actual season in order.

The advantages:

  1. Very realistic. Actual team, actual schedule
  2. Schedule is pre-made so faster start
  3. The system handles trades and signings when it happens
  4. Excellent for solo league play

There are however some huge disadvantages

  1. Your season only moves only as fast as the slowest player
  2. Locked into the number of games in the season (162) games
  3. Unbalanced a bad team is always bad

A season replay league is a great choice if you want to get familiar with the game in a hurry. But you want to be sure that the players in it are committed because you can’t move to July 21 till all of July 22’s games are done. You might impose a 24-48 hour limit to get things in.

You CAN make a season replay league into a draft league but the amount of work is considerable and if you do be prepared for a season to take a full year

C: Consider how many series you want in a week:

Unless you are playing a season replay which is played based on when a day is finished. The Dynasty league system allows you to schedule up to four series a week at any time you wish to set.

As a series can be set for anywhere from 2-4 games that means as little as 2 games a week and as many as 12.

The fewer series played in a week of course the easier it is for people to play without having to resort to autoplay but that also means the slower the season goes. Also consider that a game takes 30-45 min in my experience so a 4 game series can take 3 hours while a two game series can be done in 90 minutes.

Also remember that the more series you have in a week the less likely you are to draw in players who are already in a league or two who won’t be able to squeeze in those extra games.

And the more series a week the less time to reschedule when real life insists on asserting itself over your scheduiled gaming time.

D: Consider how many games you want in a season:

Unless you are playing a season replay which fixes you at 162 games (or 154 if you play 1957 or 60 if you play the COVID season) you have the option to set any number of games.

The longer the season you play the more real it will be and the less impact injuries and suspension will have. Of course a short season the season will be and the more chance that a streak of good or bad luck will carry the day.

Also consider a short season means that you can have multiple seasons in a year while a long season will likely mean two at the most.

And if you have a draft league remember the draft takes up time between seasons it doesn’t finish in a day (unless you play face to face).

But either way remember you are the guy who is going to have to make this schedule and enter it manually into dynasty

E: Consider How many players you want to manage:

Note that I didn’t ask you how many teams you wanted in your league I asked how many players you want to manage.

A smaller league means fewer players and the fewer players you have the easier it is to have guys show up when games are scheduled and to schedule more games in a week etc.

It’s also a lot easier to come up with a schedule with fewer teams.

A small intimate league is fun but of course there is nothing like a large league with 16-20 players and a great variety of styles of play and management, plus you get less “Superteams because so many players are used. For example in my current 1971 league there are only 6 pitchers not on someone’s roster.

But keep this in mind any online league usually involves people you don’t know personally. The only thing everyone has in common is a love of baseball and a willingness to pay for the game.

There are invariably going to be the basic problems, people from different time zone having issues being free etc but you are also going to run into disputes and errors and mistakes and if it’s your league you have to make the calls. Managing people of different temperaments, different ages et/al can be difficult so do your best to impartially stick to the rules.

I STRONGLY suggest that you avoid non-league stuff in conversation or in the slack room and if you’re on social media and are angry about something in the news don’t vent in the league space (I made that mistake a few years ago in a league and it’s a mistake I regret.)

But more than that I suggest not having any kind of cash league with a prize. Once money is involved everything changes and any mistake becomes magnified


Remember in the end it’s all about having fun, make the choices to allow the maximum amount of fun for yourself and all the work will pay off.

Before I encountered this American Thinker article, I had not paid much attention to Vivek Ramaswamy’s campaign.  After reading this article I firmly believe whoever is nominated should select him as their running mate. 

While campaigning, Vivek Ramaswamy was approached by a woman who claims to be “pansexual” asking him about his opinions regarding the “LGBTQ+ community” and “same-sex couples.” Vivek calmly and politely explained that he believes America is falling victim to the “tyranny of the minority.” Although he spoke in a polite and respectful tone, what he said is a stronger answer than Republicans normally give and one that might play very well with the silent majority overwhelmed by slogans, yelling, and the other noise that characterizes today’s political discourse.

I have been making the exact same observation for decades.  I first witnessed this back in the early 1990s, when I was a student at UMASS Amherst.  That was my first exposure  to the true political left.  It was shocking to see how a small, yet extremely vocal, minority could trample on the beliefs and wishes of so many.

Vivek begins by accurately stating that so-called transgenderism is completely at odds with homosexuality. This is an important point. Homosexuality has been around since time immemorial, whether one likes it or not. Same-sex attraction is real. However, so-called “transgenderism” is a post-modern concept that has no basis in history or biology. Nevertheless, gay men are being told they’re really women, and lesbians are being told they’re really men—and then both are being pumped full of dangerous opposite-sex hormones and given mutilating surgery to prove this lie.

Regarding same-sex couples, Vivek said he doesn’t have a negative view, which is probably the case for most conservatives. I strongly disapprove of same sex-marriage because Justice Kennedy made up an imaginary constitutional right that smashes headlong into the actual First Amendment protection for religious liberty. And Vivek, to his credit, heads straight for that problem.

I agree with all the points he made.  I have no problem with the idea of same sex marriage.  I am absolutely opposed to forcing anyone to comply with anything they are opposed to.  The Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the First Amendment protects our God-given Natural Right to believe and live our lives as we wish.

In America, he says, America is allowing a tyranny of the minority to force behaviors on people. “In the name of protecting against a tyranny of the majority…we have created a tyranny of the minority, and I think that’s wrong.” He’s absolutely correct.

Vivek continues, saying that it’s wrong to force religious people to preside over same-sex marriage ceremonies or to force women to compete against biological men or change clothes in a locker room with a man. “That’s not freedom,” he says, “that’s oppression.” Yes!

He is 100 percent correct.

Free adults, Vivek concludes, should be able to do as they will, up to a point, but they don’t get to force their behaviors on others. Those others, especially, include children, who are different from adults.

“I think a lot of frustration in the country—and if I’m being really honest, that I also share—comes from that new culture of oppression where saying those things [that is, opposing these aggressive new, leftist views] can actually get somebody punished.”

I don’t like the sentence “Free adults, Vivek concludes, should be able to do as they will, up to a point.”  He needs to add the phrase “until they hurt others or interfere with the rights of others.”  Then he would be voicing the true definition of liberty, which is the freedom to do as you wish, as long as you don’t hurt others, or interfere with the rights of others.

Today we have the Democrat Party, the Media, major corporations, Hollywood; all cramming this woke agenda down the throats of the entire nation, trying to force the vast majority of us to comply. That is the very definition of tyranny of the minority.

…is to wish and pray for God’s mercy on themselves while at the same time wishing and praying for God’s justice on others.

Because if you are doing that it means you are forgetting this key line from the Our Father/The Lord’s Prayer.

Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.

I suspect that no line in general prayer is more consistently ignored by those pray it than this is.


Glenn Reynolds notes the shock of some that passing a law concerning homeless camps and actually enforcing it has caused camps to vanish. This is a disaster for some NGO’s in the sense that they get a lot of government and state money to solve a problem that can be solved by just enforcing the law.

Key quote:

We get urban decay because we tolerate it. And as for the nonprofits/NGOs, homelessness is far too lucrative a problem to solve.

There is no incentive to solve a problem that is both a profit center for you and allows you to claim virtue.


Speaking of profit centers there is a 2nd post at Insty today on a man who will be teaching about the Budlight fiasco at business school. It’s is certainly a subject worth scholarship but it that had a line that likely floated under the radar to most people that I found absolutely hilarious:

He emphasized that beer is essentially the same product, and what sets it apart is the power of its brand

I would submit and suggest this is pretty much true. I suspect a lot of brand loyalty in beer is all about habit. Break that habit and you break that brand.


And Speaking of Breaking the habit as of Today Tweetdeck is no longer a free service when I tried to access it today I was redirected to a screen offering me a blue subscription check for $80 a year.

The real point is Twitter’s value basically comes from addicting people to multiple streams of data and giving folks who want to reach a maximum size audience (advertisers etc) access to that stream. This move gives an incentive for people to walk away from the stream and once people are broken of the addiction your done.

While Elon Musk should of course make the best possible business decision for his product I submit and suggest this is rather foolish. Tweetdeck makes twitter useful because it allows you to view multiple streams in the same window. Without it twitter involves too many tabs and simply isn’t worth my time. I might keep a tab with my DM page available and I might answer embedded tweets I see elsewhere but if you want to get me to see something by putting it on twitter odds are starting today I’ll miss it


On a totally different note I was shocked to see that season 4 of the chosen was going to include the razing of Lazarus from the dead.

Given that this is the last big miracle before the entry into Jerusalem I figured we would see it till at least season 5, particularly since we are going to get the beheading of John the Baptist this season which comes much earlier.

That suggests that either season 7 is going to be all passion and resurrection, with season six all Jerusalem

(Don’t be surprised with the number of characters there is plenty of material for this to be the case) and Season five everything else OR that Dallas plans on moving up the Death, Resurrection and Ascension of Christ and having a large chunk of season seven covering a big chunk of acts.

Either way it will be interesting to see how he handles it.


Finally we have regularly been getting short weeks at work. Last week was 30 hours, the week before 32 and the week before 30 which is a great incentive to burn vacation days for people and unpaid time off has been offered which can be tempting on a really beautiful summers day.

Yesterday on the drive in all of us in the car agreed that we would be lucky to end up with four hours although one of us was optimistic enough to suggest me might manage 6.

Much to my shock and everyone else’s as well there seemed there was plenty of work in my department and by moving some people to it during the day ( and letting a few go home early who wanted to ) all of us who stayed managed to our delight a full 8 hours of work which guarantees us at least a 32 hour week.

That’s how bad the Biden economy is, it’s so bad that getting a full days work in the middle of a work week on a day you’re scheduled to work a full day is a pleasant surprise worthy of note