Posts Tagged ‘election 2010’
Great Primaries kid…
Posted: June 9, 2010 by datechguy in elections, opinion/newsTags: democratic party, election 2010, primary election, republican primaries
The Ga-4 Forum story makes the news:
Posted: June 3, 2010 by datechguy in elections, opinion/newsTags: cory ruth, election 2010, Georgia 4th district, hank johnson, liz carter, newsmakers live journal, vernon jones connie stokes
Yesterday’s story on the Ga-4 forum broke through to the MSM in two different stories: First CBS:
When James Welcome, executive producer of the Newsmakers Live political forum, opened the show Wednesday night, he made this statement, “Tonight we are being called racists all over the web because we failed to invite Liz Carter.”
That’s quite a statement, CBS posed some tough questions but the most interesting thing that was said came at the end of the article:
(Vernon) Jones and (Connie) Stokes would not to participate in the forum unless Carter was allowed, so the organizers gave her a seat and allowed her to participate.
In terms of strategy this was rather smart of them. Cory Ruth is a good candidate and in an open primary a lot of black votes that might go to Jones & Stokes could go to a young dynamic fellow like Ruth so anything that can dilute his potential vote (particularly in a primary) would seem on its face a wise move.
The AJC also covered this and their story highlights the power of the new media:
“I just sent out one tweet,” said Liz Carter,
That one tweet led to posts on several major blogs and all kinds of national reaction, as for the debate itself. Ironically this was one of the topics that Cory Ruth brought up with me at lunch, the use of the new media to change the landscape.:
Once Carter showed up for the forum, the organizers allowed her to participate. Ruth and Carter were quizzed separately as GOP candidates and were friendly. Former DeKalb CEO Vernon Jones and current DeKalb Commissioner Connie Stokes, the democratic candidates, complimented and criticized each other. Rep. Hank Johnson, the incumbent, did not show up for the debate.
The lack of congressman Johnson diminished the debate but considering the controversy not being there was likely a wise move considering blog headlines like this:
Obama endorsed rep Hank Johnson to participate in segregated forum The Other McCain 6-2-2010
Scheduling conflict or no, without actual knowledge of if the White or Hispanic candidates would be included showing up would have turned this story into yet another uncomfortable question for Robert Gibbs instead of a local story.
Incidentally I can’t for the life of me understand why the other two republican Candidates didn’t show up and try to get included. If you are going to try to win you have to have sharp enough elbows to push yourself forward.
A final quote:
In the end, the moderator praised Carter’s media skills.
“She is good, she is damn good,” Eaton said. “She was nobody yesterday. She is somebody today.”
I think how this plays in the Champion and the Crossroads News is going to be very interesting.
In my opinion this event allows everyone to exploit openings: Carter needs to schedule events in the Black community to show that she intends to fight for and represent every vote. Ruth has two advantages. He can use the strength of his statement and positions to appeal to voters in the northern Republican counties (where he does have some support already) while continuing to give black voters in the south an alternative to people they like, but may not agree with. (Johnson)
Meanwhile Jones can build on Johnson’s absence to push themselves as an alternative. Jones slogan of Jobs First is the right message and nobody doubts his energy and ability. Stokes needs to do the same but frankly in my opinion is squeezed between the popularity of Johnson and the large Shadow that Jones casts. It is a fine needle to thread but from what I’ve heard she is a rather competent woman and may be able to do it.
Johnson meanwhile sites back and lets all of them divide the vote of those opposed to him to prevent a runoff to set himself up for the general election.
If nothing else a race in a district that was thought of as “safe democratic” certainly hasn’t been boring.
Update: The Daily caller was on this too. Too bad they didn’t have a certain blogger on their payroll, they might have had an awful lot more data over there.
Forget Paul & Blumenthal…
Posted: May 21, 2010 by datechguy in elections, opinion/newsTags: arizona immigration law, election 2010, illegal immigration
…the political image that is going to be the most devastating to any political party will be the image of democrats giving a standing ovation to the Mexican president as he comes down falsely on the law in Arizona.
If I’m the republican party I’m playing and replaying that image over and over again.
Speaking of people who are not smiling in Pa-12 Crizz smile is fading…
Posted: May 15, 2010 by datechguy in elections, media, opinion/newsTags: election 2010, elections, MainStream media, mark critz, media bias, pa-12, tim burns
not only because of GOP star of the year Scott Brown’s appearance on his behalf but because of a of a new twist.
Pittsburgh TV station WPGH has suspended the latest ad for Democrat Mark Critz for making false claims. The ad by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee falsely claimed that Republican Tim Burns supports a 23 percent national sales tax and wants to ship jobs overseas.
Dave Weigel notes that Democrats stand behind the claim and the ad remains up in other markets:
…they stand by the arguments in their ad, which are based on Burns’s support of the Fair Tax and his signing of Americans for Tax Reform’s taxpayer protection pledge. Democrats tell me the ad will remain on the air on other TV stations in Pittsburgh and Johnstown, which serve Pennsylvania’s 12th District
they are blaming this on the station’s conservative ownership. I wonder if they will claim factcheck.org is another bunch of biased conservatives too?
But this ad is quite misleading because it fails to mention that the FairTax proposal would also repeal the federal income tax entirely and do away with the Internal Revenue Service. It would also eliminate gift, estate, capital gains, alternative minimum, Social Security, Medicare and self-employment taxes. But anyone viewing the DCCC’s ad could easily conclude that Burns favored slapping a 23 percent sales tax on top of all existing taxes, which is not true.
Usually it would be an issue if factcheck disputed the ad but as Robert Stacy points out:
Well, of course, the Democrats aren’t backing down. They’ve got the MSM to cover their asses and pretend that the Fair Tax represents a “national sales tax” over and above current federal taxes. Of course, they don’t want to deal with the facts.
What is even more interesting and something I’ve touched on before is how a race that didn’t get much national attention when the newest polls showed Burns up by as much as 6 points last month in a heavily democratic district has suddenly become a “must win” for Republicans in a district they haven’t won in 38 years UPDATE: The previous sentence originally said 70+ years, that was misleading, the current 12th district is made up of two additional districts that haven’t elected a republican in 70+ years. In the 12th district that last republican to win was John Saylor in 1972, that’s my bad. when the latest poll give Critz an advantage As Sean Trende points out:
there are over sixty districts represented by Democrats with better Republican performances than PA-12. The Republicans’ path to 218 seats doesn’t necessarily run through this district – in fact, I don’t think their path to a 1994-esque 230 seats necessarily runs through this district.
This is basically extending the Morning Joe spin of yesterday to pretend if the democrats win that the tide of opinion has turned. We all know what the real question is: Can Burns manage to pull it off even without the presence of a Sicilian with a fedora?


