Here is the text of the appeal I submitted for this third lockdown in one week for retweeting the link to benford’s law
Not only is this the 3rd time you have falsely & baselessly accused me of tweeting “privately produced/distributed intimate media of someone without their consent” when I’ve retweeted this post on Benford’s statistical law but it’s the 2nd time you’ve done so AFTER APOLOGIZING FOR THE 1ST LOCKOUT AND SAYING IT WAS IN ERROR.
Not only are you slandering me in writing I might add but after the last time I won my appeal I tweeted you that I’d be retweeting this in 50 hours and updated you several times that I was going to do so.
Yet you locked me anyways and again made false accusations against me in writing. If the first time was in error what was the second, or the third. I’d call it deliberate malfeasance and that’s the most tame description I can think of
Now if you are so terrified about people seeing statistical evidence that Joe Biden’s “magic ballots” are just that have the courage to state you will not allow such evidence to be shown. Stop falsely accusing me of putting out ” privately produced/distributed intimate media of someone without their consent”
It’s just this type of deceitful and dishonorable behavior that makes your brand distrusted by half the population.
I will not delete the tweet in question nor will I submit. The only question is will you actually play by your own rules or is there a different set for those whose politics you don’t like?
You’re CEO has sworn under oath that this is not so, your repeated actions toward me this last week suggest he’s a liar.
I think a better word for that last sentence would have been “confirmed” rather than “suggest” but I guess I’m just too polite a guy
The items below are from the site gnews from this post which I’m copying in it’s entity to see if twitter will ban this post or mark my post once it contains the contents therein
I am not making any claim that his analysts is spot on, I’m just twitter
Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law (Mathematics)
As the vote counting for the 2020 Presidential Election continues, various facts suggest rampant frauds in Joe Biden’s votes. So does mathematics in terms of the votes from precincts.
Benford’s law or the first-digit law, is used to check if a set of numbers are naturally occurring or manually fabricated. It has been applied to detect the voting frauds in Iranian 2009 election and various other applications including forensic investigations.
This is what described by Wikipedia:
“Benford’s law, or the first-digit law, is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. The law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the leading digit is likely to be small.
For example, in sets that obey the law, the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit about 30% of the time, while 9 appears as the leading significant digit less than 5% of the time. If the digits were distributed uniformly, they would each occur about 11.1% of the time. Benford’s law also makes predictions about the distribution of second digits, third digits, digit combinations, and so on.”
One of the examples is the population of the world, which are naturally occurring numbers.
Distribution of first-digit (in %) of population numbers in 237 countries in 2010. Source: wikipedia.org
A number of people on the internet have checked the votes (precinct by precinct) of Joe Biden, Donald Trump as well as other candidates for their legitimacy in terms of the Benford’s Law.
According a Reddit user, r/dataisbeautiful’s calculation, the ‘normal’ distribution of first digits for the different candidates based on Benford’s law is illustrated below.
Youtuber Nyar has shared the observations on a number of counties, concluding that Trump and others’ votes have natural distribution but not for Joe Biden’s.
In Fulton County, Georgia, which overlaps with the Atlantic metropolitan where Joe Biden is expected to win, all of the three candidates have normal distributions for their votes. (Joe Biden 72.6%, Donald Trump 26.2%, Jo Jorgensen 1.2%. Source: .theguardian.com)
In Miami-Dade County of Florida, which includes the Miami metropolitan where Joe Biden is expected to win, all candidates’ votes obey Benford’s Law. (Joe Biden 53.4%, Donald Trump 46.1%, Jo Jorgensen 0.3%. Source: theguardian.com)
However, in the Milwaukee County of Wisconsin, which is in one of the key swing states, Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law while other candidates’ don’t. (Joe Biden 69.4%, Donald Trump 29.4%, Jo Jorgensen 0.9%. Source: theguardian.com)
So does that of Allegheny of Pennsylvania which includes Pittsburg. (Joe Biden 59.0%, Donald Trump 39.9%, Jo Jorgensen 1.2%. Source: theguardian.com)
It looks like maybe Biden had lost big cities like Chicago and Pittsburgh, which is why the fraudulent votes need to be brought in, which skew his curve away from a normal looking one.
For those who are interested to reproduce the analysis, you can follow the instructions here and give it a go.
Author: River|Himalaya Scholars
Now let’s see if twitter tags MY post and starts locking people accusing them of distributing :
privately produced/distributed intimate media of someone without their consent
I’m doing this live during the podcast (that youtube has suddenly cut me off of unexpectedly of course)
Here goes
Update: Well they didn’t lock me for putting up this exact reprint post but they locked me as soon as I attempted to retweet the original
Twitter censorship running a couple of tests on the subject)
It all begins at 11 AM EST (programming note DaPodcast will move to 11 AM EST for the rest of the year due as overtime will be the rule at work till Christmas)
You can watch live here (last weeks podcast is a placeholder)
I promise no singing this week
See you soon
FYI if you like what you see please consider hitting DaTipJar as that’s what this podcast is for
Update: As expected twitter immediately locked me out again as soon as I tweeted out the gnews post, what wasn’t expected was my Youtube connection dropping five minutes into the podcast so twitter couldn’t be seen doing so live.
I’m sure that was just a coincidence
Update 2: It gets better suddenly the rest of the podcast that I recorded doesn’t seem to exist anymore when I tried to save it.
The 2nd thing I did was send out some DM to the people I bet with on the election and to Fault Lines Radio (who usually contacts me via twitter to invite me on_ to warn them that I might end up being blocked again:
Here is the DM I sent to fault lines radio show:
Quick FYI just got out of the twitter gulag for posting a link to #benfordslaw piece that they claimed was porn posted without the consent of the person involved. after the lockout I refused to delete the tweet and appeals, won the appeal and checking if the lockout is still automatic for it. If I am locked out or suspended best way to get me is a comment on my site datechguyblog.com use the term ” (not showing this for obvious reasons)” & I’ll know it’s you guys. wish me luck
And then I sent out the following tweets:
2/4 I am about to re-tweet my initial post with a link to the story to the G News piece: " HomeJoe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law (Mathematics)"
test 1 (cont) …..Ok I seem to be still here, we'll give it 30 seconds (incidentally that's how science works you propose a proposition make an experiment to see if it is supported and keep testing it not by media consensus)
Now I should point out something here that I didn’t realize until a few minutes ago. When I look at test 1 while logged onto my own account I can see my tweet.
BUT when I look at test one when not logged in (which is how I’m accessing these tweets now what shows up in place of the tweet is “This tweet is unavailable”.
Oddly if I click on that “unavailable tweet” in that different browser the tweet shows up and I can access the piece
But I digress…
So after test one it was time for test 2
Ok twitter has passed test 1.
Now Test 2:
I will attempt to retweet the initial tweet with the link to the #BenfordsLaw piece that they claimed was "“privately produced/distrubted intimate media of someone without their consent" #magicballots#stopthesteal
Everything was seemingly working and I was literally in the process of typing out that twitter had passed test two when suddenly….
Mind you this was less that one hour after I my account was unlocked and I had been informed by twitter that I had been locked out in error.
As normal there was an email notice from Twitter. One guess what the email said I had done…
…if your guess was they said I had distributed:
privately produced/distributed intimate media of someone without their consent
Then you are correct.
So in summery for the 2nd time in under two days twitter has not only locked my account but slandered me by claiming I’m pushing out Porn.
I’m again appealing this lockout. Here is what I wrote them this time
Not only have you once again slandered me with a palatable lie claiming that I shared “privately produced/distributed intimate media of someone without their consent” but you did so less than one hour after you UNLOCKED said account acknowledging that this same accusation over tweeting out the same link which goes to a piece on Benford’s mathematical law was false and stated I was locked out in error and apologized for doing so.
Furthermore you did so after I tweeted twitter safety saying I was about to retweet the tweet that you apologized for locking me out over to confirm that things were restored. That doesn’t cover you guys with glory.
If you are so afraid of people seeing circumstantial evidence of Joe Biden’s election 2020 magic ballots have the strength of character to admit that’s why you’re locking my account rather than making base and slanderous accusations against me distributing porn.
Last time it took about a day. Let’s see how long it takes this time for them to admit they are wrong.
I further intended to keep performing this test when reinstated and going through this process until twitter removes the lock on that piece or bans me.
I suspect that will be sometime after the court cases on election 2020 are resolved…unexpectedly of course.
Closing thought. If they are persisting in this kind of thing, that suggests they know they are not secure in their position and are doing all they can from keeping regular people from seeing rational arguments demonstrating the existence of Joe Biden’s Magic Ballots
Da Techguy's (no longer backup) Blog 