Oh, I am heartily tired of hearing about what Lee is going to do. Some of you always seem to think he is suddenly going to turn a double somersault, and land in our rear and on both of our flanks at the same time. Go back to your command, and try to think what we are going to do ourselves, instead of what Lee is going to do.
U.S Grant at the Battle of the Wilderness May 6th 1864
Yesterday I pointed out that the idea that DA Allen Bragg wants to indict Trump for political reasons is both:
- A travesty of justice and a threat to the republic
- Not an argument for voting for Trump vs a better possible candidate
- Has brought out some of the worst in his surrogates attacking not Bragg but possible primary opponents
Having said these things there is an excellent article at PJ media (I know that’s a redundant statement but I digress…) that points out how this entire business shows some of the best features of Trump when it comes to fighting against our political foes.
This is pure speculation, but does appear that the combination of Trump getting in front of the narrative and scrutiny from House Republicans gave Bragg a temporary case of cold feet. I do think that he has been dreaming about the perverse star turn he’ll get from indicting Trump for so long that he will eventually go through with it. When he does, Trump’s public relations machinations of the past week will probably make it backfire on Bragg even more than it would have if he’d had done it on Tuesday.
Trump has definitely had his “A” game going in this situation. That hasn’t always been the case in recent months (see: “DeSantimonius”). When he’s focused he can play PR chess better than anybody.
The reason why this is the case is something right out of one of my favorite books of all time Pratt’s Preble’s Boys where he notes the phrase: “Having decided on Battle”.
Rather than acting in fear of Bragg, the grand jury or the Soros Machine targeting him Trump choose to fight and “Having decided on battle” he like any good general decided to choose the terrain for what was coming.
In fact, Trump is so good at this that, at some point in the last few days, it almost seemed as if control of the situation shifted from Bragg to him. It was Trump, not Bragg’s office, who told the public that he would be arrested on Tuesday of this week. When that didn’t happen, it made Bragg look weak.
The fact that the grand jury wasn’t seated on Wednesday really made it seem as if Bragg was faltering
Personally my favorite bit was causing massive numbers of the press to rush out to cover protests that weren’t happening basically turning the press scrum into the Monty Python Wicker’s Island skit
And of course all of this gave time to his allies in the house to start bringing heat as well. and it produced this hilarious response from Chuck Schumer the Senator who represents Bragg in NY
And more importantly when Trump has been able to not only direct the flow and pace of the story but is able to highlight Bragg’s failures
On Wednesday morning, Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social that Bragg was having problems with the grand jury. “The Rogue prosecutor, who is having a hard time with the Grand Jury, especially after the powerful testimony against him by Felon Cohen’s highly respected former lawyer, is attempting to build a case that has NEVER BEEN BROUGHT BEFORE AND ACTUALLY, CAN’T BE BROUGHT,” he claimed. “If he spent this time, effort, and money on fighting VIOLENT CRIME, which is destroying NYC, our once beautiful and safe Manhattan, which has become an absolute HELLHOLE, would be a much better place to live!”
It’s worth noting that when he targets Bragg he (Trump) looks confident and unafraid and running the show because he know that left for what it is and more importantly is not afraid of them.
That’s the reason more than anything else why so many on the right love Trump and would be delighted to see him back in the White House
Closing thought:
Contrast his handling of Bragg & Company to his targeting of DeSantis which has a whiff of impotence about it as the Governor has brushed it aside. That’s the difference between fighting leftists without substance and fighting a conservative who has substance and knows it..
I would point out this … in 2016 we didn’t vote for Trump because of what he HAD done but what he WANTED to do in office … thus far Desantis has campaigned on “I’m not Trump” and “Look at what I have done” not on THIS is what I will do …
[…] More On Hayek CDR Salamander: The 2024 Defense Budget – A Mixed Bag For The Navy Da Tech Guy: Trump Trumping Allen Bragg Highlights the argument in Favor of His Nomination. He Fights!, also, To protest or not to protest, that is the question Dana Loesch: Nikki Haley Says America […]