You want real censorship, here you go:
A Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put a right-wing politician on trial for making anti-Islamic statements.
Of course this pales before the vast censorship during the Bush years of left wing voices right?
Reaction: Gates of Vienna
Notice that the court claims the right to grant “normal leeway” to politicians. That is, they are the law. The political leaders, who are elected by the people and are charged with passing laws, do so only on the sufferance of judges, who make the ultimate decisions about what is and isn’t permitted.
The end of free speech in Europe
If they succeed in doing this, we will be rendered mute, and thus defenseless, in the face of the advancing jihad and attempt to impose Sharia on the West — in fact, one of the key elements of the laws for dhimmis is that they are never critical of Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an, so this initiative not only aids the advance of Sharia in the West, but is itself an element of that advance.
Did you notice that picture? Either Wilders is REALLY tall or Spencer is really short.
You know as time goes by the wisdom of the Bill of Rights and the people who insisted on it before ratifying the Constitution did a service to us for all time.
Update: Little Green Footballs doesn’t care for either the prosecution or Wilders:
Wilders, however, has called for the Koran to be outlawed. In other words, Wilders wants to ban books with which he doesn’t agree. If there’s one thing we should have learned from history, it’s that book-banning never turns out well—and it’s anathema to the American ideals of free speech and free choice of religion.
This prosecution is disgusting and wrong, but it’s difficult to cast Wilders as an icon of free speech when he explicitly advocates taking away the rights of others.



[…] own post By datechguy Mark Steyn is one of today’s great writers. His comment on the Wilders situation deserves its own post: The PC nellies of the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission, happy […]