Archive for March, 2022

Some “Why?” ‘s Under the Fedora

Posted: March 17, 2022 by datechguy in Uncategorized

Given the media’s inability to tell the truth concerning the last administration and COVID combined with their rejection of a religion that considers false witness a sin why would anybody trust the media’s line concerning Ukraine?

Given that NATO is a defensive alliance why are people implying that if Poland, which has a legitimate interest in stopping Russia where it is, chooses to get involved of its own free will that NATO in general and we in particular must join in if they do?

Given that the owners and players managed to get everything done just in time to start the season why on earth did they bother with a lockout which only built up bad blood between them and the fans?

Given that San Francisco can’t keep their own streets clean and safe and their citizen protected why would any city or state care if the city decides to boycott them in lieu of solving their own myriad problems?

Given yet another revelation concerning fraud and BLM (this time in Boston) why is anyone still pretending this is anything other than a griff?

Jean LaFitte: If your offers’ good it will stand up under fire.

The Buccaneer 1958

Two weeks ago I had a physical and to the shock of my wife who thought my bloodwork was going to show disaster things are pretty much where they were. I’m fatter than my doctor would like and I’ve got some cholesterol and some sugar but not enough to warrant drugs. My doctor remains pleased that I no longer work behind a desk or am the boss as I had been in previous jobs and continue to have to walk and climb ladders in a warehouse. Apparently the lack of promotion for the guy who doesn’t speak Spanish has unexpected health dividends (and spiritual ones too since the lack of having to constantly solve problems or make decisions leaves plenty of time for prayer as I walk and climb but I digress…). Given how pleased my wife was with the results it may be worth it.

Now that I’m getting very close to sixty my doctor did recommend was the new Shingles vaccine, which unlike the old one with one booster provides lifetime protection from this very painful disease. One in ten people get some painful side effects the next day but that’s a small risk for never getting singles again. In fact by the time you’re reading this I will be getting the shot.

My doctor also asked me if I wanted the COVID shot as he noted I never got it. I declined explaining

  1. I already had COVID so I had the antibodies.
  2. The side effects of the Vaccine tend to affect the heart and my family has a history of heart problems
  3. While the risk from the vaccine is small so is the risk from COVID and since you can still get COVID and even die with the vaccine (As my brother demonstrated) why take both risks when I can settle for one?

My doctor didn’t make any fuss concerning it and we went on from there.

And THAT ladies and gentlemen is the difference between what the left calls “anti-vax” and actual reality.

I’m very happy to take a vaccine that provides permanent protection from a painful disease and that has gone though the normal clinical trials and procedures and whose side effects are nominal.

To take a so called “vaccine” that doesn’t provide permanent protection from a disease for which the risk is minimal which has bypassed the normal safeguards and whose side effects can be fatal, particularly to someone like me.

The reality is the COVID Vaccine is pretty much a glorified flu shot. Now there is nothing wrong with having such a shot available and if after weighing the risks and rewards you decide it’s the right choice for you, that’s fine as it’s good to have options, but I submit and suggest that we would all be better off if that was how it was sold rather than redefining what a “vaccine” is and putting people at risk for their careers and livelihoods’ to force it upon folks. In fact if it was as “safe” and “effective” as they said such heavy handed methods, lotteries and mass censorship of opposing views would not have been necessary because their claims would be able to stand up under fire.

If people on the left, or people on social media have a problem with that, I really don’t give a damn.

The last Democrat

Posted: March 15, 2022 by chrisharper in politics
Tags: ,

By Christopher Harper

For the past few months, I’ve been reading biographies of U.S. presidents, starting in chronological order. I’ve made it to Nos. 22 and 24: Grover Cleveland.

That’s right! Cleveland served two terms, but they were interrupted by the election loss in 1888 to his opponent, Benjamin Harrison.

Cleveland, the last conservative Democrat, was a particularly interesting leader. Unfortunately, the Democrats turned toward progressive politics after Cleveland left the White House.

Cleveland served two terms, 1885-1889 and 1893-1897. He won that election in the popular vote in 1888, but he lost in the Electoral College because he angered the corrupt politicians in New York and lost the state. Therefore, Cleveland was the only president to serve two terms that were not consecutive. Furthermore, he and Woodrow Wilson were the only Democrats elected between 1861 and 1933.

The son of a Presbyterian minister, Cleveland was known for his honesty and integrity. In 1881, Cleveland was elected mayor of Buffalo and later governor of New York. He opposed high taxes, imperialism, and government subsidies to businesses, farmers, and veterans. He fought corruption in New York and elsewhere, implementing civil service examinations rather than political patronage.

In his Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Cleveland in 1932, historian Allan Nevins wrote, “[I]n Grover Cleveland, the greatness lies in typical rather than unusual qualities. He had no endowments that thousands of men do not have. He possessed honesty, courage, firmness, independence, and common sense. But he possessed them to a degree other men do not.”

After being elected president in 1884, he faced a distinctly partisan Republican Congress. Keep in mind that the Republicans were much more progressive than the Democrats back then.

Cleveland vetoed dozens of bills passed by Congress; his supporters sustained them. Perhaps his most famous veto occurred when he refused to support $100,000—today’s equivalent of $2.9 million—to buy seed grain for Texas farmers, who had lost their crops during a drought.

In his veto message, he outlined his desire for limited government. “I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the general government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering …. The friendliness and charity of our countrymen can always be relied upon to relieve their fellow citizens in misfortune. This has been repeatedly and quite lately demonstrated. Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character.”

Cleveland nailed it. Look at how dependent so many people have become on federal money!

Cleveland often ranks outside of the top 10 of American presidents despite his many accomplishments. To me, he deserves to be near the top of the list right behind Washington and Lincoln.

Five Unpleasant Truths Under the Fedora

Posted: March 15, 2022 by datechguy in Uncategorized

A lot of what is being said on Twitter concerning Ukraine and Russia is all about people trying to feel important and involved on something that they have nothing at all to do with. That self image trumps any other consideration in the world to them.


You don’t start teaching kids about various sexual stuff in school unless you are hoping to have them sexually active young and that people refuse to see this speaks volumes about either their stupidity or complicity in such a goal.


If the choice is admitting idiocy and dealing with reality as it is vs remaining in a painful self affirming fantasy a large chunk of the population will choose the latter regularly.


The last decade but particularly the last year has proved John Adams right about our constitution only being suited for a moral and religious people. The farther that we move from morality and religion (Christianity in particular) the more inadequate it becomes.


There are many wise things my Father taught me. One of them was not to care if someone had more as long as I had what I needed. It’s a lesson that more people could use, but it seems to me that they were taught that it isn’t enough to have more, others must be made to feel that they have less.