Archive for September, 2009

a totally different thing altogether:

Guidance limiting care of the most premature babies provoked outrage when it was published three years ago.

Experts on medical ethics advised doctors not to resuscitate babies born before 23 weeks in the womb, stating that it was not in the child’s ‘best interests’.

The guidelines said: ‘If gestational age is certain and less than 23+0 (i.e at 22 weeks) it would be considered in the best interests of the baby, and standard practice, for resuscitation not to be carried out.’

Medical intervention would be given for a child born between 22 and 23 weeks only if the parents requested it and only after discussion about likely outcomes.

Well it’s not like hospital workers would refuse treatment to a live baby when his mother is begging for it, oh wait:

Sarah Capewell begged them to save her tiny son, who was born just 21 weeks and five days into her pregnancy – almost four months early.

They ignored her pleas and allegedly told her they were following national guidelines that babies born before 22 weeks should not be given medical treatment.

Miss Capewell, 23, said doctors refused to even see her son Jayden, who lived for almost two hours without any medical support.

She said he was breathing unaided, had a strong heartbeat and was even moving his arms and legs, but medics refused to admit him to a special care baby unit…

…She told how she begged one paediatrician, ‘You have got to help’, only for the man to respond: ‘No we don’t.’

Jayden Capewell  Born & Died Oct. 3, 2008

Jayden Capewell Born & Died Oct. 3, 2008


I found this story in the Corner, my son and I are both a bit shocked over it, him more than me because he is 18 and still innocent enough to not understand how a doctor can look at this baby and decide to let him die without any effort. It would seem contrary to human nature, I think the opposite, it is very human to duck responsibility whenever possible.

I have a message for the “death panel deniers” who don’t want to read editorials that use those words. You may not believe that they will exist, but let me tell you Jayden Capewell damn well believes in them.

I’m going to go all Catholic on you for a sec; it’s not the soul of Jayden that needs prayers, it’s the doctors and staff that let him die, they’re the people who you need to pray for.

Update: it’s just below the headline on Drudge. This is going to make for a fun day on Rush and on the talk shows tonight.

Update 2: Now in the green room, it will progress from there to the main page and I predict to Rush before the day is done and then to Fox.

Update 3: Don Surber has more examples while Darren Hutchinson calls it a conspiracy theory and equates it with Birtherism. Tell that to the Capewell family.

On Morning Joe this morning John Meacham talked about the Newsweek reporter who has been held in Iran for several months.

He is of course correct to be upset about this and lambasting Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the irony of him coming to the UN to freely speak when a reporter can’t freely report a presidential election.

During the discussion it was pointed out that Iran is developing Nukes and as I watch I couldn’t believe it. Didn’t the senior editor of Newsweek Michael Hirsh say that lumping Iran into the axis of evil was “devastatingly stupid?

Amazing the perception difference when George Bush is not in the White House.

I really like Gateway pundit but they are being unfair …

Posted: September 9, 2009 by datechguy in opinion/news
Tags: ,

…to Chuck Todd in this post:

Chuck Todd explained on Hardball why Americans oppose Obamacare.
It’s not because the legislation stinks.
It’s because they’re racists.

That sounds really bad and I’d be really upset with Todd if I didn’t ya know watch the embedded clip:

Barnicle asks if there is any sense in the White House that race has a part to play in the opposition to the president.

Todd states that the White House is staying away from that argument with a ten foot pole but the advisers who are “outside” the White House are jumping all over it first. He gives their argument but doesn’t endorse it.

Now watching it you might conclude that Barnicle is endorsing that opinion obliquely but you can’t, in my opinion fairly state that Todd is.

This morning on Morning Joe they are covering editorials. They mentioned briefly that Sarah Palin wrote an editorial in the Wall Street Journal today, but “we aren’t reading that one” said Mika.

Instead the covered Bill Clinton’s advice for democrats and Maureen Dowd.

After all why would you be interested in what the single most popular figure in the opposition party, the one who single handedly caused the “dare I say it death panel” language to be pulled from the Senate version of the bill.

Morning Joe has can’t get over the idea the Mrs. Palin stands behind her use of the phrase “death panel” even backing it up in written testimony to the New York State Aging committee.

When Mrs. Palin talks it is news, whether the Morning Joe crew in particular or MSNBC like it or not.

Update: But the opinion of very far left Kathleen Vanden Heuvel of the Nation is not only worth covering but worth having on to discuss things. Makes sense she is MUCH more relevant than what Sarah Palin thinks right?

Update 2: Maybe in deference to Marc Ambinder et/al we should refer to her as “She who must not be reported.”