He uses fewer words to nail the Jones mindset but then again he’s a pro and I’m in my pajamas:
Jones and other Obama radicals (the more middle- and upper-middle class the pedigree, the angrier the denunications) have a strange tendency in the past to have slandered much of American society, then abruptly — once anointed into its highest echelons — to equate their own careerist ascendency with a positive referendum on America’s sudden deliverance (the “apartheid” U.S. in need of having its entire system “changed” is now okay since a Van Jones is in the White House.)
Michelle Obama articulated that view with her trope about not previously being proud of America until her husband become a serious candidate, but apparently for the next few years we are supposed to endure lectures from a variety of leftists like Jones that their own success allows us to find (temporary) redemption from them.
I’m actually not sure if the resignation will come, Jones’ type is a fighter and he is a “true believer”. Rev Wright, older and wiser knew where his bread was buttered and understood that he had to go under the bus.
But Jones primary thought isn’t the gravy train. As a crazy uncle he passionately believes what he believes. Normally it would not be a big deal to let go someone like him but with trouble and anger among his humorless base already the discharge of a true believer for true belief might be too much at this moment.
It is not charitable but I don’t mind sitting back and watching the White House twist on the vine on this one.
Update: Charles doesn’t like Jones but he still is asking where’s the beef:
When this “news” came out, I spent hours searching the web for any corroboration at all in Jones’ own words that he believes the 9/11 attacks were a conspiracy by the US government. If I had found something, I was prepared to start yelling as loud as anyone about it, because I utterly despise Truthers.
I found: nothing. Nothing at all.
So I looked around those right wing blogs this morning because I was curious to see if any of them had found real proof for this accusation, apart from the word of Truthers and hate sites, and found: nothing. Nothing at all.
Charles is an honest man. I have to say his argument is looking better, he isn’t one to miss stuff on the web.



Ummm… No.
Stop being a CJ follower and think for yourself.
Groupthink is so yesterday.
Actually I started my search with the express purpose of proving him wrong.
The evidence pointed in a different direction, I’m a tech guy (in fact DaTechguy) if the evidence points in a direction I’m obliged to follow it.
Again not being a truther is not being Joan of Arc, it just makes him slightly less of a creep. That’s not an achievement.