January 30 2005 Instapundit:
Reader Peter Ingemi, meanwhile, offers a prediction:
I’m remembering the coy saying about the French resistance. “If everyone who claimed to be in the resistance really had been, there would have been nobody left to collaborate.”
I make the following prediction: In 20 or 25 years (it might not even take that long) all the people who where saying that the war was wrong and Iraq was wrong will talk about how America brought democracy to Iraq and Afghanistan and how they were a part of it due to their protests and desire for democracy and the end of tyranny. (of course they will not mention that the tyranny that they meant was us.) If the same people who write the current history books write them again be sure that this will happen.
Heh. Yeah, just like everybody pulled together during the Cold War.
And the prophesy is fulfilled
Oops Sorry wrong prophesy, lets try again:
Kind of hard to figure out which clip is a better example of Fiction isn’t it?
Meet the Press this week should be interesting.
Da Techguy's (no longer backup) Blog 
[…] Hat tip: Da Tech Guy. […]
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent’s position.[1] To “attack a straw man” is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially similar proposition (the “straw man”), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.[1][2]
I see no relation to this comment to my post, (I thought it was spam till I checked out your site. So I will approve it for now, if you would care to elaborate you are welcome to do so.